![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Steve
Well I used to have a pretty Respectable T207 collection until I just got fed up with the grading standards SGC and PSA have. I have cards graded SGC 50 that are as clean and crisp as PSA or SGC T206 7's. Also it seems that more cards are graded authentic because of obvious manufacture miscuts rather than trimming. Are the grading companies harder on these cards because of their gloss finish and miscuts, or are they just a stepchild of the tobacco sets. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
It is quite easy to voice your dissatisfaction with current grading standards, | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 18 | 07-25-2006 11:51 AM |
Poor Grading by PSA? Tobacco Card | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 05-12-2006 08:39 AM |
Grading Tobacco Cards | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 03-15-2006 12:01 AM |
What's wrong with photo cards grading standards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 12-29-2005 09:16 PM |
Steve Verkman grading standards? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 09-01-2002 01:36 PM |