|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Paperloss experience with SGC grading
Posted By: Dave
Having not dealt with SGC on submittals before, curious what anybody else has recieved with a similar type card...(sorry, no scans yet tonight) T206 with the front of a SGC60, maybe 70....small amount of paperloss on the back (Piedmont back) paperloss in over the 3 in the 350 and the B and A in the word baseball above that....no other marks, creases....possible to get a SGC40 or would 30 be highest of anyone else's experience?? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Paperloss experience with SGC grading
Posted By: barry arnold
Hi Dave, |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Paperloss experience with SGC grading
Posted By: Judge Dred (Fred)
When I see posts like this about small patches of paper loss I immediately begin to think that the graders look at a card to get the "whole picture look" but then they may miss the little things (which actually are big things) for some reason or other. Maybe the grader looks at the card, says this is a "6", the phone rings the grader puts down the card and the next thing you know the small spot of paper loss is missed. Who knows how this really happens though. You have to figure, the grading service gets paid a nominal amount to have the following done:
I guess that's a lot for about $10. In any case, it's their business so you'd hope that they'd catch all the little flaws. What's an acceptable quality control number here? 99.9% accurate on not missing the little stuff (small patch of paper loss, small crease, small mark)? Too bad this wasn't a PSA card, we could all start a PSA bashing thread. I think it's been at least a good couple of weeks since we've seen one of those... did everyone make a news years resolution not to do a PSA bashing thread? Heck, I feel like starting one.... |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Paperloss experience with SGC grading
Posted By: Dave
Well generally I do submit to PSA....I've just never gotten any T206 regardless of how good the front was and how little paperloss was on the back (providing there was some) anything above a PSA 2, thats why I was curious if SGC was more leniant and if there was a chance for a 40. If not I can always send to GAI and maybe get the 6 or even a 7... |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Paperloss experience with SGC grading
Posted By: barry arnold
not my Matty, Dave!! |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Paperloss experience with SGC grading
Posted By: Dave
Was kind of hoping you had gotten hold of some bad wine this evening and werent in your right state of mind to make the logical decision.... |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Paperloss experience with SGC grading
Posted By: barrysloate
SGC will wallop you for paper loss on the back. They feel this greatly compromises the condition of the card. I have sent them cards with EX/EX-MT fronts and the tiniest bit of paper loss on the back, and they were graded "fair". Be forewarned. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Paperloss experience with SGC grading
Posted By: dennis
this card looks nm/exmt but there is a tiny flake off the left border that lowered it to vg. i love cards like this because it appears at least ex but scg graded it vg 40 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Does this VG/EX 4 have paperloss on back? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 07-17-2008 07:12 PM |
Can anyone explain grading and paperloss? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 05-30-2007 08:15 AM |
Paperloss on Front + PSA = 4 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 39 | 07-17-2006 06:27 PM |
Anyone ever received a PSA 4 with paperloss on front? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 22 | 04-29-2005 03:09 AM |
Experience with SGC | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 08-19-2002 07:06 PM |