![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: FYS
Per SGC: |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Brian H (misunderestimated)
This is very good news. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Josh K.
very cool. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Rick
At least GAI came out with pack grading. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Josh K.
You are critical of SGC because they developed a larger slab for t3s but werent the first to do so? Its called meeting customer demand. Boy I hope you arent running any businesses. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Rick
It doesnt make them a bad company at all...but PSA does take the time to come up with new ideas, develop them and then create a demand. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Josh K.
I agree that psa has a decent slab for t3s - far better than the plastic slabs gai was using for oversized items. But I would hardly say they created the damand. The demand has always been there. The were simply the first to market. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: jay behrens
Being first doesn't neccessarily mean the best. Being first gives you advantage of early market share, but I have no doubt that SGC will once again offer a superior product in both form and function. PSA can come up with all the inovations it wants for the hobby, but that will not convince me to ever use their service. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Rick
Lee, |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Bottom of the Ninth
A great grading company is measured by their ability to authenticate, grade accurately and identify altered cards. Before being an innovator in the industry, I prefer they offer great customer service, a nice looking holder and accuracy on turn around times. SGC more than meets these standards. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Lee Behrens
Just to let you know Rick you are not an innovator by calling Jay, Lee. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: davidcycleback
The foundation of PSA's business is grading cards, and PSA paid Alan Hagar for the rights to use his system of entombing cards with a 1-10 grading scale. In other words, 90+ percent of PSA's business is based on a system borrowed from someone else. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: T206Collector
The amount of energy it took PSA to come up with a larger holder to hold T3 cards is about the same amount of energy released by a mouse when it farts. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: FYS
"At least GAI came out with pack grading. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: FYS
"It doesnt make them a bad company at all...but PSA does take the time to come up with new ideas, develop them and then create a demand." |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: FYS
"PSA created the whole concept of the registry |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Paul Griggs
Glad to hear SGC is doing this. I've made a few requests to PSA about using thier T3 holders for some of my larger cards, but I dont think they have made any serious attempt to come up with the needed inserts. GAI is also currently working on larger rigid slabs. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Josh K.
"The amount of energy it took PSA to come up with a larger holder to hold T3 cards is about the same amount of energy released by a mouse when it farts." |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Brent Butcher
SGC's new website does allow you to look at every previous submission you've made by just logging in. When you do bring up your submission you can click on the card and it brings up the Pop report all for free! PSA was definitely innovative for charging for things like that. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: rick
Revenues are a good thing. |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Joe_G.
Thank You SGC ! ! ! |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: James Gallo
My God man have you looked at any od sized card in a PSA holder. They look like total crap and the smaller cards slide around like crazy. Some have that vacumed insert type look. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: WP
Rick, |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: jay behrens
You are fogetting the single greatest inovation for slabbing...the custom cut inserts. So you can't claim SGC has not produced any notoeworthy inovations. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: FYS
"Like i said before, quality of holder and accuracy of grading are merely an opinion." |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Josh K.
you would almost think that rick works for psa. I do have to give it up to psa for their single greatest innovation - I mean it was pure genius to stick undersized cards in a condom before slabbing them. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Rick
SGC has a niche in pre war ...but hardly the leader. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Al Crisafulli
I'm sorry Rick, but you're wrong. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Rick
AL, |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: jay behrens
Another inovation, with the addition of "The Way I Collect" catagory for the set registry. They were able to realize that not everyone collects sets. |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Anonymous
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
T3's from SGC, PSA | Archive | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 0 | 07-27-2008 10:12 AM |
SGC Multi Card Fantasy Slab | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 04-18-2007 04:49 PM |
Does anyone know when the SGC holders for T3's will be available? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 09-01-2006 04:51 PM |
Question about card positioning within SGC slab. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 02-16-2006 07:25 PM |
RE; Sgc re-slab into new holder from old?? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 08-26-2005 10:34 PM |