![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jeff J
I see there are several w517's for bid on Ebay which seem trimmed. They are listed as hand cut by PSA. The top or bottom of all cards are hand cut bit NOT the sides! What gives, why are they willing to encapselate these trimmed cards but will reject every other trimmed card? I am confused. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: fdnyladder7
It's a good looking card, but it is confusing. Our w517's were handcut short as well and recieved PSA "Authenticate" only. Reckon it all depends on if the grader got lucky the nite before. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Anson
Well, there is supposed to be a minimum measurement standard applied. I'm not really sure how they have graded W517s historically. But, if it falls within or very close to the guidelines, it should grade. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Kyle
I agree, its all luck of the grader. With that PSA Authentic Ruth, I'd resubmit it for a numerical grade if you really want one. I returned a strip last week that was graded as authentic when I have high hopes it deserves a numerical. If you're looking to sell, I think its worth the extra money, and especially now with the $13/5 day special. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Rhett Yeakley
With all due respect, this has nothing to do with whether or not the cards were close to measurements. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Anson
Rhett, I didn't really examine the scan close enough to look at the sides of the card. I guess I was looking at in from a general standpoint. But, you're right. Just because they were supposedly "hand-cut", it should only allow for that in vertical sense. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: warshawlaw
I stupidly bought a GAI-authenticated V100 Hornsby with a shave and a haircut on all sides. Apparently, PSA and GAI have decided to treat the "authentic" label as a license to slab anything. SGC refused to encapsulate (grade or authenticate) some strips I sent in that it claimed were too small. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Mike Campbell
I have a Foxx 517 graded 8, by SGC. The card has not been trimmed. The sides are completely original. Just more of PSA's inconsistancy I guess. It is sad how far PSA has fallen in the past couple years. I hope they can turn it around. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: identify7
I am glad that you mentioned this Jeff. My original reaction was that the Dykes appeared too narrow, although still a good looking card. Similarly, I felt that the Terry was also too narrow. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jeff J
Rhett is correct, I was asking about the trimmed sides. This goes against the gradng system entirely if they allow the sides of these (or any strip card) to be trimmed. If they allow this and they sell well, I COULD make up several Mint Ruths cut carefully from full strips, but it ain't right. Nor will I. What I also dont understand is that to my knowledge no grading comapny will grade or encapsolate the full 3 card strip, yet this is how it was issued to the public!!! |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jeff J
Yes, this is real money on both sides. It's also a 4 sided trimmed card they just bought. Having them all in uncut format (full strips), I can prove it. I hate to see people get ripped off. Why does a grading service allow this? |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
W-517 for trade/sale | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 4 | 03-30-2009 02:29 PM |
517 down.. 3 to go.. | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 03-25-2008 10:34 PM |
W 517 mini's - Are they numbered? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 11-05-2007 02:58 PM |
517 Mini | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 09-15-2006 05:02 PM |
Mastronet Auction Item 517 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 02-12-2005 03:48 PM |