![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Bob S
Hi Folks. I have just signed up as a member of network54, so please bear with me as I learn the ropes. Thanks. :-) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: John S
Any time a card is altered in this manner it will reduce the value significantly. The level of rarity influences how much the value will be reduced. OJ's are not particularly rare, but many collectors would be willing to accept cards in this condition. Another factor would be the player pictured. If you have a Kelly, an Anson, or a Ward the percent decrease in value as compared to an intact card would be less than for a common player. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Bob S
Thanks, John S. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: john/z28jd
It matters how badly the cards are trimmed and then which player/pose it is.You might have a card that 2 people have been looking for,for awhile in which case they will pay as much as possible for it. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jay Miller
As a rough rule of thumb assume 2/3 of the card's value has been lost. That is, an intact $300 card with the ad trimmed off the bottom would now be worth $100. Certain factors may change this percent slightly but surely more than half the value is gone. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: tbob
I don't know if other Old Judge collectors feel the same way but as someone just getting in to 19th Century cards, the grades on the slabs have less meaning (for me) than do 20th Century card grades. An oj with great contrast and nice eye appeal which is a 20 because of back writing or small paper loss on the back is far preferrable to a 40 or 50 with light contrast or that ugly pinkish tint. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Kevin Cummings
All that has been said so far is on the mark. With all the new interest in the Old Judge set, one cannot be nearly as picky as one might have been able to be in the past since many cards are being snapped up as quickly as they are listed. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Judge Dred (Fred)
I don't mind the pink tone so long as the image is strong. Below are examples of a few pink toned cards: |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Bob S
Thanks to everyone for their comments. Unfortunately, I paid about $75 each for these cards in 1998. I guess I've learned a lesson. :-( |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: john/z28jd
I wouldnt assume theyre all bad deals Bob until you know if the players on the cards truly are commons.Just because theyre not hall of famers doesnt mean theyre worthless in an Old Judge sense.Theres some players id pass on if they were trimmed but theres a few cards id pay alot for despite being trimmed because they might not be readily available |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Julie Vognar
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: ramram
Bob S. - who are the players and what poses? Some of the board members can tell you just how common the card actually is. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Bob S
Thanks everbody. ramram, I've got the cards stored away from my house and I'm recovering from a battle with Lyme disease. When I feel able, I will get them and post a list as you suggested. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Old Judge Question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 02-25-2006 04:52 PM |
old judge question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 02-20-2006 10:51 PM |
Another Old Judge question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 02-20-2006 02:15 PM |
Old Judge Question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 06-25-2005 03:13 PM |
old judge question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 07-11-2003 09:11 PM |