![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Josh K.
I just won two willards chocolates (Hornsby and Bancroft) that I believe are trimmed. Both measure about 1/32 short in each direction and do not exhibit straight cuts. I was about to contact the seller (theiceking) when I noticed this buried in his description: |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: jay behrens
It's something that should have been disclosed in the intial description and buried under the history of Canadian cards. Not sure you have any grounds for a complaint. He did disclose it, even if it was buried. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: quan
just went over the description, it wasn't necessarily "buried". not like it was in extra small fonts or buried on line 4 of the paragraph, it was toward the end and easy to pick up. when buying raw cards i always read the description very closely and ask for exact measurements if need be, because i know what i'm getting myself into when buying raw cards. it could save u alot of money, but there's always that raw risk. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Richard
That's a string of bad luck lately, the willards and the grover. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Judge Dred (Fred)
Josh, |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: JimB
I think that since the guy disclosed they exact issue you have a problem with, this should probably be chalked up to a lesson learned about reading the descriptions carefully. He may not have had any deceitful intent. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: jay behrens
I call it deceit when the seller decides to bury a serious flaw deep within a description. The fact that it is buried in a history of Canadian cards is proof enough for me that the guy was looking to bury it. It should have beenn in the first paragraph where he says the card grades as such becuase of creases. There is no mention of the card being hand cut, trimmed, etc. This is a VERY important piece of information that needs to be disclosed there, not at the end of a history of Canadian cards. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: dennis
look at the picure of the card,it is so obvious they are hand cut/trimmed. and it is also in the discription, if you did not look at the picture . i agree it is "hidden" in the b.s. but come on! is the picture of the card too small also? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: BlackSoxFan
Okay, so what then is the value of these cards (if we assume they are trimmed) and how rare are they? I would like to know b/c there are a handful of them that i have been watching. Also, i have emailed the seller a few times once to ask dimensions and once to ask him what happens if these won't grade, i have yet to hear from him on either account. If they are rare and trimmed, how do you properly evaluate the price? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: identify7
The value of these cards are identified by the bidding results. Josh was not way out in left field here; this was a hard fought battle among knowledgable competitors, imho. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: jay behrens
I won the near Ex card. I didn't notice the trimming note at the bottom message either. Probably wouldn't have influenced my bid much since the card I won is the only card this player appears on. It's not like I could wait for his Goudey or e121 or some other card to appear. My card measures exactly 2" x 3.25" which is what is listed in the SCD big book. Lipset lists the cards as being 2 1/16". It's obviously a vintage trim job since the corners show wear. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Josh K.
Despite what others have said above about how obvious the trim jobs are on these cards, it was apparantly missed by the majority of the people who won these cards from this seller (this is based on private communications and responses to this thread). |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: jay behrens
I have no doubt the cards would have sold for less, but not a whole lot less, than what they ended up going for. I may put the card in my next submission to SGC just to see what they say. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: identify7
Not everyone considers trimming to be a significant consideration on cards which otherwise would grade vg/ex and below. This is due to the fact that you can lower the grade of these cards without impacting their value much. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Max Weder
As a winner of a number of these cards, I must confess to only one thing: I now realize I am functionally illiterate, as I didn't notice the wording in the description. I can't blame the seller; I read the entire description and simply missed the description, and I should have asked the right questions. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Another trimmed question | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 3 | 09-07-2008 07:51 PM |
Crossover trimmed question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 12-27-2007 07:10 PM |
Question about high end graded cards being trimmed | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 31 | 01-22-2007 10:23 AM |
A question regarding the Mastro trimmed card thread | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 42 | 10-02-2006 11:36 AM |
t205 Trimmed Question???? | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 2 | 03-24-2006 08:42 AM |