![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: jackgoodman
A card graded by CTA in a PSA category? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Anson
I would agree, but I also question whether or not it's trimimed top to bottom. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Adam J. Moraine
REPRINT???? UNLESS it were graded by PSA/GAI/SGC I would not touch it. Has anyone heard of this obscure, no name grading company that graded the Young? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Charlie
We give up...What's wrong with it? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: dennis
it's an off centered, trimmed, reprint. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jeff Lichtman
The card is way too white to be real. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Brian Weisner
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Julie
..... |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: MW
Card is real. Possibly trimmed. Possibly not. Can't really tell from the given image. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Anson
It doesn't appear to measure out. I know scans can distort but it clearly looks short to me. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Judge Dred
The sellers name is about right, just one letter off - Steelerman (should be Stealerman). |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Joe
I lived in las Vegas from 1996- 2001 and frequented a card store northwest of the city. I'm pretty sure CTA grading company is out of California and they used to have on site grading in the store once and while. The store oners were originally from California and CTA grading was only known on the West coast. The do set up at the national conventions. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Brian Weisner
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Anson
I simply stated that the card looks short. This card would be close to $3k if it were graded by any of the big three. Why would someone sell it for less than 1/3 that price when they could simply spend the $10 to have it crossed over? |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Darren J. Duet
The card appears authentic to me. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jeff Lichtman
Brian, in the immortal words of Bill Murray in Stripes, "Lighten up, Francis." |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: quan
i'm tired of the newbies posting and passing judgement (sometimes on long-time board members' auctions) on subjects and cards they seemingly know nothing about! It's really comical. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Anson
I'll remind you that there are long-time board members who have "accidently" sold reprints and trimmed cards before. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jeff Lichtman
I agree: take some of that awful mental baggage you're expending listening to other board members offer their opinions (that were requested by the person who started the thread) and buck up and buy the card which, in your estimation, is a wonderful deal. And then just flip it into a PSA or SGC holder and make three times your money. If this is too exhausting for you, perhaps you need to take a nap. |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Brian Weisner
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jeff Lichtman
Brian, |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Brian Weisner
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Judge Dred
Brian, |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Judge Dred
By the way, the card looks real but trimmed. I suppose that I shouldn't have to state the obvious there. If it's not graded by SGC, PSA, GAI, Vintage Beckett or SCD then I have a difficult time accepting the card as graded by a reputable service. I'm guessing CTA is along the same lines as PRO. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Judge Dred
By the way, M-F there's a good chance I'm in front of my computer during work hours, during the weekend I sporadically get on line to check a few things. Today was a busy day so my immediate response to this thread was just "not in the cards". I don't live, breath, eat and drink the internet - I have a life beyond the virtual world that keeps me plenty busy and entertained. I do enjoy this forum because every once in a while you find that killer thread that really interests you. Newbie? What's that? I hate to break the bad news to some folks but I know of several old time collectors (have been around the collecting block a few times) with really nice material that don't post on line. Would you consider them a newbie if they were to make a comment or a contribution for the first time? I suppose some may consider them to be a "newbie" to the board but I'm sure they'd get over it. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: dan mckee
No question the Young is original, possibly trimmed at the top, but original. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Al Davis
CTA is well known for its inattention to detail. They have never met a pair of scissors they haven't liked. if you ever get a card rejected by PRO (ha, ha) send it to CTA (Card Trimmers Anonymous). |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: T206Collector
...in holders other than PSA, SGC, GAI, Beckett or SCD are presumptively altered, otherwise the seller would have had the card crossed over into a reputable holder, where he could triple his money. I wouldn't trust a dealer that operated any other way. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Richard
While I am not a supporter of CTA (I have never sent anything to them to be graded, I don't know if they even still exist), I have had luck crossing over their cards to Beckett (2 for 2 on crossover). I had picked up the two cards cheap enough and they looked good in the holder so I decided to gamble and it paid off. These were not vintage cards. |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: dan mckee
Beckett? Is that a grading service? |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Richard
While Beckett is scoffed at, on this board, as a pathetic vintage grader (deserved or not deserved), their dominance in the modern market should not be ignored. |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: patrick mchugh
To me the card fits tight in the holder and is not trimmed. But a regrade because of high low centering would get a 4 at best. |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Anson
check the holder again. I don't think it is as tight as you think. |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: dan mckee
That is great Richard, I thought PSA had the modern world dominated. You are telling me Beckett has a grading service and is dominating the modern stuff? I think that is super. Dan. |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Richard
Ah, I see the problem: |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Anson
Vintage = <1990????????? |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Julie Vognar
is that the card appears to be real, but might well be trimmed; nobiody claims to be sure. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Live Auction: What's Wrong With This Picture? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 10-31-2007 09:48 PM |
What's wrong with this picture? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 03-04-2006 10:25 PM |
Wrong picture on cards. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 07-11-2005 02:24 PM |
OT - But What is Wrong With this PSA Authenticated Picture? Old time TV fans let me know | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 36 | 02-25-2005 06:20 AM |
Picture Sharing - WRONG FORUM - GET OUT | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 12-16-2003 09:25 AM |