![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Texas Ted
Each of us has our own idea of the attributes of cards acceptable to us for our collection. Often, the attributes are governed by budget. To me, a card that has a a trim that is only obvious to the professional grader or with some means other than the naked eye, fits fine in my personal collection. Other defects, such as a touch of paper loss, a stray ink mark or a minute drop of cat pee make most cards anethema* to the slabbing crowd, but fit nicely into my budget and top loaders. As long as I know about the defect, and it is reflected in the price, I don't have a problem with collecting that kind of card. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dan Bretta
I would too. As long as the card is aesthetically pleasing then it fits nicely in my collection. I have seen a lot of poor/fair/ungradeable cards that all fit my collection. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Max Weder
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dan Bretta
Sometimes I wonder if they don't do it because they know that many will be re-submitted over and over. I think they should at least let you have the option of having it slabbed as authentic. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: warshawlaw
I recently picked up a 1911 Zeenut Peckinpaugh with most of the borders removed but otherwise really nice looking. All a function of scarcity; remember the half a Honus auctioned off some years ago? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Hal Lewis
Since the cat pee doesn't bother you... |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Paul
I agree with Texas Ted 100%. I purchased a slightly trimmed but otherwise ExMt Cracker Jack Honus Wagner for about $200. It has always been one of my favorite cards, but well beyond my price range. Now I have the card, it looks great, and I'm very happy with it. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: jackgoodman
GAI will slab a trimmed card and label it "authentic" if requested by the submitter. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: jay behrens
For those of us on a limited budget, trimmed cards are a great way to get wonderful looking cards at a reasonable price. Or you can end up with a neat novelty item like my t206 Johnson that cost me about $10 |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Julie
Galvin and Radbourne: |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: identify7
Within the past year or so I have purchased a Ned Williamson for $15, and a '48 Leaf DiMaggio for under $50. Sometimes I wonder why. But most times I realize that I needed the money which I saved on these for other cards. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: warshawlaw
I purchased an E103 Lajoie with a little bit of recoloring in the red (a crayon job; obviously not a deception). No way do I afford that card in decent shape. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Texas Ted
Hal: |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1952 Topps Trim Tells/Help | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 0 | 12-27-2007 09:04 AM |
factory cut narrow not trim? | Archive | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 0 | 04-03-2006 10:03 AM |
Worst Trim Job Ever???? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 23 | 02-13-2004 11:32 AM |
Nice Trim Job | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 02-11-2004 06:01 PM |
Haircut? Just a trim | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 06-15-2002 05:58 AM |