![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Todd Schultz
r316 5x7s? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Ben
W554's |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Julie Vognar
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: pete
why do some have name on bottom and some dont?? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Paul Griggs
The two without the bottom script are described in the add as having a thinner card stock, so I suspect those two are R316 5 x 7 photos, & the others W554's. The R316 5 X 7 photos are thin like the smaller Kashin R316's. The R316's & W554 share the same photos. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: pete
i did see that after...are they worth the $135 ? just curious, not interested in bidding...really. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Paul Griggs
I could be wrong about those two being R316's. The R316 5 x 7's supposed to have the team listed too. The thinner card stock is what made me think of the R316's. I now remember that I bought a Ruth W554 from WV's Shoebox cards awhile ago, that had no bottom script. I sent it back, due to it looked much worse than the scan. As far as it being worth $135.00 probably, but not much more, due to the condition. I'm planning on bidding, because I only need the O'Doul to complete the set. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|