![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Glenn
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=31718&item=5177297769&rd=1 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Todd Schultz
Why seller didn't have GAI grade it, since Baker and Rocchi supposedly looked at it closely anyway--close enough to conclude that it was 71-29 centering. You'd think the seller would want the qualifer removed, which would have happened had he gone with GAI. Maybe he didn't want the label changed to the correct 1916, for fear it would throw that whole rookie thing up in the air |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Hal Lewis
Todd: I think you are 100% correct. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Hal Lewis
Having said that... |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jason Duncan
I recently had PSA change a label on one from 1916 to 1915 for me. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Hal Lewis
Jason: |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
M101-5 Ruth (Closed Ebay Auction) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 11-21-2007 02:17 PM |
WTB: Babe Ruth M101-5 or M101-4 | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 03-24-2007 05:31 PM |
Question re: Ruth M101-4/M101-5 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 02-08-2007 07:08 PM |
M101-5 Ruth OC | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 06-09-2006 12:19 AM |
fake M101-5 Ruth | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 09-11-2004 09:08 AM |