![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Cap
I would like feedback. When you see a collection of T206's or T205's in a catalog, they're usually categorized in lots/near-sets/sets depending on who did the grading. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: jay behrens
I prefer SGC, but will buy other slabs if it's a card I really need. GAI slabs I don't mind. I love the label on the top edge of the slab. The lone PSA I ever bought, I crossed over to SGC right away. No way I was gonna let a PSA 6 slide around become a 5 or lower because they are too cheap to properly holder a card. Then there are all the issues that come with PSA and I have no desire to keep a card in a PSA slab for the long term. If I was looking for a quick flip, I'd prefer PSA only because I know there are people out there that still blindly follow PSA and hope all their problems will go away (For those that don't know what they are, doa search. They are all well documented here) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Cap
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: dennis
i'm w/you cap if they are pre war i keep them in whatever slab they came in.if they are raw i put them in a lucite holder which is just as nice to me as a slab.if they are post war i put them in pages in binders.if i buy a post war card i crack them out of whatever holder they came in. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: wesley
Admittedly, I was very much a slabhead the last few years. Recently Mark Macrae and Julie introduced me to mylar holders. They're similar to Cardsavers in that they are semirigid, but they were originally intended for preservation of stamps and paper documents. The mylars are clearer and apparently safer for paper than traditional Cardsavers. So from now on, my cards will be in the mylars. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: jay behrens
My guess would be that if you gave them a complete set of e95s that were in PSA, SGC and GAI holders, that they would most likely get the all crossed over to one company. Probably wouldn't cost you a cent. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Scottopotamus
I have probably crossed over about 25 PSA cards and 10 GAI cards to SGC for my T206 collection. (all others were bought "raw" and submitted to SGC or already in SGC slabs) |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Bill
I prefer SGC because of the look and their consistancy. They may be a little tougher on their grading, but as they say "buy the card, not the grade." I only collect T206's and currently have all but 5 cards graded by SGC. Bill |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Anonymous
Where does anyone get the impression SGC is a tough grader? I have seen many of overgraded T201's in SGC 84 and up holders. Are the just easy on T201's? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: jay behrens
I've noticed that with t201s too. They seem to be very lenient with that set for whatever reason. Then you give them a non-sport issue or caramel cards and it's as if someone else looks at the cards and just hammers them for the minutest flaw. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: David Vargha
My 50's and newer cards are all PSA. SGC and PSA are equal for me in pre-war. SGC also grades some pre-war stuff that PSA doesn't touch. I don't currently own any GAI cards, but am not averse to doing so. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Julie Vognar
I'd get them graded by SGC. (many collectors of really early stuff prefer SGC for those cards). |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Judge Dred
It used to be that PSA graded cards would get higher bids (on ebay) if you were selling cards. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Kenny Cole
Maybe I'm the lone voice, lost in the woods, but I still remember when people were able to determine the grades of their cards without the assistance of those 20-year-old pimple-faced kids employed by PSA who would do it for you. In a lot of ways, I liked it better then. I didn't have to worry if a PSA 5 would really cross over to a SGC 60, or if I might lose money by doing that. I didn't care (and still don't) whether the GAI slab could cause "rattlers," because GAI didn't exist. When we bought a card, it was normally based upon our own personal assessment of what the card's condition was -- not the assessment of someone you have probably never met, and, who, frankly doesn't care nearly as much as you do, if he/she makes a mistake. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Billy
Too tough to identify wrinkles and minor creases in scans, so that is why I feel grading companies are a good idea to stick to for online purchases (also solid authentication). |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Billy
Jay, |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Darren J. Duet
I generally don't send cards in to be graded by anyone. But when buying not in person I prefer to stick to graded cards. My opinion is that SGC is the best by far for pre-1948 cards followed by PSA and then GAI. post-1948 cards are best graded by PSA & Beckett. I find that Beckett is very consistent and strict for the post war stuff. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Mark Holt
While I think SGC has the best holder and grade the most conservatively I am putting my t206s in PSA holders at a rate of about 10 a month. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Harry
Right now, I have the highest level of comfort with PSA and SGC. I exclusively submit to PSA but have purchased SGC and GAI cards. I've gotten some ugly overgraded cards from lower tier companies in full collections that I have purchased. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Anonymous
Why does PSA have different recess sizes when they slab tobacco cards? |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Show Grades vs Mail Grades | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 04-16-2008 08:34 PM |
Can trimmed cards in high grades be statistically proven? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 04-07-2007 08:46 AM |
Looking for Rebel Oakes... any cards, any grades. | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 02-01-2006 06:06 PM |
Grades of Stained Cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 04-26-2003 01:44 PM |
No matter how long you have been collecting cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 01-28-2003 02:35 PM |