![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: travis
Could anyone tell me what exactly this is? Is it a harpers weekly woodcut? A print from harpers weekly? And is it authentic or a reproduction? Any help will be greatly appreciated! |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Anonymous
It is a Harper's Woodcut. The original was part of the magazine page, would be on light tan colored newspaper-type stock and have printing on the back. The woodcut is smaller than the whole page, so would have had to have been removed. As they stayed over the years inside the magazine, Harper's Woodcuts are often in strong condition-- so high grade itself should not make one fear it's a reprint. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Anonymous
Thanks that was very helpful indeed! I greatly appreciate it! |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: doug goodman
This is the Chicago Baseball Club, from the top half of page 652 in the October 14, 1882 issue of Harper's Weekly. This woodcut is #20 on the VCBC checklist. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: travis
i got word from a seller that this is 8X10... i thought these were supposed to be 9X11??? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jimmy
Travis, |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Joe Hunter
As mentioned above, the key to the authenticity of the Harper's Woodcuts is color and printing on the reverse. The Harper's are slightly tan in color and will always have printing on the reverse. Leslie's will also be off-white, but maybe not as tan as the Harpers. I bought one on Ebay one time that was a reprint, and it was easy to see the difference. When I contacted the seller, I really believe he had no idea, and immediately refunded the purchase price and postage and didn't even want the print back. In my opinion, the Harper's and Leslies woodcuts are one of the most economical ways to collect authentic 19th Century memorabilia. By the way, I also have a very nice woodcut of the 1869 Reds from a New York Clipper of the same year. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Anonymous
Well, i contacted the seller and he told me the back was the same color as the front and plain (no writing) so i guess its a reproduction! |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: davidcycleback
If you are interested in purchasing baseball woodcuts, you'll be able to find them now or in the future. They're nice affordable items, worth purchasing. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Glenn Davis
Certainly a reprint. The original was a half page (9"x7") of the 10/14/1882 Harper's Weekly, which was a newspaper and not a magazine. I think these are the best bargains in 19th century memorabilia and most of Doug's extensive checklist are not too terribly difficult to find, with patience. Many of the team images which show up on ebay are reprints, though. If you are interested, I have several extras for sale or trade. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: travis
im very interested glen...email me at tlwise12@aol.com with some pics and prices if you dont care...and thanks so much for ur input! I very much appreciate it! |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Glenn
Travis, |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
One of the dumbest things I've ever seen..... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 02-28-2009 09:46 PM |
Things I hate | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 115 | 02-22-2009 10:25 PM |
what are these things? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 03-03-2008 04:27 PM |
Am I seeing things? | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 13 | 12-28-2007 05:49 AM |
I can say positive things... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 07-03-2002 12:42 PM |