![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
Hey Folks, |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: mrc32
Why not just put "reprint" in small type in the bottom corner of the back? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: John(z28jd)
Because its not hard to create a little paper loss where the small type reprint would be.Its been done before with other issues and people have sold the cards on ebay as real. If you notice theres a small R on the front of the picture,which is big enough so you can differ between one of his and a real one,even with a small scan......Great cards Scott,could you show one of the backs with the stats? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Hankron
Personally, I would write in invisable ink who I sold the cards to-- 'I made this reprint and sold it as a reprint to Dr. Bond.' Down the road, you can prove who was naughty and who was nice. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Hankron
In case anyone is wondering, invisiable inks are only viable under blacklights. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: runscott
and I have tried to make people comfortable with this project - in fact, I agree that many of the suggestions were fantastic, and I wouldn't have thought of them myself. But I won't be writing "reprint" on the back, changing the colors to "non-OJ" colors, or re-drawing the photos as cartoons - even then someone would argue that it might be sold as an "unknown issue". I want these to look real, and I'm making no attempt to hide that fact - but if I wanted these to be forgeries - ask Leon - I could do it, and I'm not. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Hankron
What would be neat would to include a card or small sheet of paper, both saying how the original Old Judges were made (albumen photography) and how to tell the difference between an original and reprint. I think most buyers would find it interesting and useful. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
in my original post I said these might still be sold as a "reprint" and what I meant was as "real ones"....my 6 yr. old daughter was tugging at me to go to soccer and I didn't proof it very well....sorry about that....regards all |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: runscott
That also sounds like a good idea for a VCBC article, but sounds familiar. There was a good OJ article in there recently, but I can't seem to find that issue. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Halleygator
I want to say THANKS to runscott for sending me a set of the reprints ... they are AWESOME!! |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: jeff s
Hal, |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: halleygator
That's the ticket! |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Is this a reprint - looks too good to be true.... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 26 | 06-05-2006 02:16 PM |
Too good to be true? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 22 | 01-16-2006 02:52 PM |
W514 Jackson - 2 good 2 be true? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 06-16-2005 11:57 AM |
To good to be true? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 05-01-2005 09:37 AM |
Too Good To Be True? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 35 | 07-16-2002 09:11 AM |