![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Good morning and Happy new year !
What are your thoughts on this Joe D.??? Thank you in advance. Andy |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
My opinion is that there are way too many problems with it: not fluid, problems with the "oe", the transition to the "m" is off, and don't like the final 'o". But I'd wait for other opinions.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In the mid 1960s when I published the monthly sports collectors magazine, The Sports Trader, I saw a large amount of authentic DiMaggio autographs. From
memory, this does NOT look like it is authentic. BUT, when a player signs on a baseball that can cause his signature to appear differently. How much does the buyer want, or (if owner yourself) how much did you pay? Happy New Year! |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Not authentic IMO.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am on the not real side also.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
UGH! STAY AWAY. Here's a good example. Nice flow. The oe is always a telltale sign. Forgers can never get the Joe right. it always looks like ae
Last edited by johnts1; 01-14-2025 at 12:22 PM. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Opinions on these E95's | Haybag | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 02-02-2010 09:46 AM |
Opinions please | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 02-08-2007 04:49 PM |
Any Opinions on this One? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 29 | 05-02-2005 12:00 PM |
Better Buy (opinions please) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 04-14-2005 09:14 AM |
Better Buy? (opinions please) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 18 | 04-14-2005 01:22 AM |