![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm just now getting into graded vintage, and my LCS has a 1955 Topps Kaline that looks awesome. In fact, I asked them to take it out of the case so I could get a look at it. I was hoping to buy it with intent to grade. However, upon inspection, it's got the letter "Y" written on the front in ink. The card overall would probably grade a 6 if not for that mark.
So how does a mark affect the grade? Will it knock all the way down to like a 1-2 even though the rest of the card looks good? Will it only knock it down a point or 2? If it gets, say, a 6 grade but with an MK designation, does that mean it's really a 4? Just trying to figure out of I want to buy the card and sub it. It's really, really sharp. So just curious.
__________________
Anyone on Twitter? Here's my new handle @1millionrangers I have done deals with: snowman, exhibitman, roquan, vintagetoppscards, bobsbbcards, sayitaintso, tsp06, gorditadogg, 4reals, bnorth, clydepepper, jcfowler6, jimmer77, tsp06, Bartholomew_Bump_Bailey, swk473 plus others. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
228. Twoplicity
The suppositional rule of thumb that a card with a qualifier should have a monetary/trade value equal to a straight graded card two whole numbers lower. • The supposed two point drop in grade for a qualifier emanated from the PSA Registry, where a PSA 6 MK would only count as a PSA 4. It's become a rule of thumb, but many of us don't ascribe to that particular theory, and put more consideration into the overall eye appeal (i.e., is the off-centering minor, or is the mark not too blatant?) to determine its value. • With PSA it is pretty straight forward. If they say a card deserves a grade of X and it has a mark, the result will be a PSA X MK. With other TPGs, it is not so easy to pinpoint what a mark will do to the number grade, or how low it will drive it. • On a side note (and it's nothing personal, as I'm talking about each and every collector), no one is ever right about the grade they say a card will get, so if you're thinking the 1955 Topps Kaline should be a 6 (sans mark), you should definitely act like it will come back a 4 or 5 to protect yourself, and make an offer to the owner accordingly. Good luck!!
__________________
All the cool kids love my YouTube Channel:
Elm's Adventures in Cardboard Land ![]() https://www.youtube.com/@TheJollyElm Looking to trade? Here's my bucket: https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706 “I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice.” Casey Stengel Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980s. Overpaying yesterday is simply underpaying tomorrow. ![]() |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The mark type also matters. If it is in pencil or ball point pen and that caused a ridge to form on the cardboard, consider the highest grade it would get to be a VG-EX 4(MK). If it's in Sharpie or Marker and did not damage the surface, then it would get higher based on the look of the card without the mark.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I can offer a recent example from my own experience.
I sent a 1960T Maris to SGC. It had writing on the back where a previous owner wrote their initials in pen. I thought it was a 6 if not for the mark. SGC knocked it down to a 2. I recently sold it. You can see the listing here: https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/276378146537
__________________
Working on the following sets: 1916 and 1917 Zeenut, 1954B, 1955B, 1971T and 1972T |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
SGC, without qualifiers, will normally drop any card with writing or even miscut down to the 1.5-2 area, so that's what I would have expected if I tried SGC.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Here is my 48 Bowman Red Schoendienst. Looks superb but has a small pen strike on the back. I would say it lost 2-3 grades because of it.
__________________
I have done deals with many of the active n54ers. Sometimes I sell cool things that you don't see every day. My Red Schoendienst collection- https://imageevent.com/lucas00/redsc...enstcollection |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Does greening or hulking affect grade | pootshwan | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 8 | 03-10-2021 04:19 PM |
Does centering affect a grade this much? | irv | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 2 | 05-15-2018 05:32 AM |
How much does a Qualifier affect the Value of a higher grade card? | Blunder19 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 02-12-2017 06:15 PM |
postcard writing affect grade | JoeyF1981 | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 6 | 10-28-2013 03:17 PM |
Does this affect Exhibit grade? | skooter | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 03-02-2011 03:00 PM |