 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
08-19-2022, 02:13 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Question for set collectors.
Been working on a number of sets for years, including the 1927 W560 set. For a while now have only needed a card of Jimmy Foxx to complete my basic player set. However, I actually have two different uncut sheets of the W560 cards, both of them with a Foxx card as part of the uncut sheet.
Do any of you other set collectors out there consider that as a complete set then, or since I typically put my cards in binders, would you want an individual Foxx card that is not part of an uncut sheet to consider the set you have as complete? Never really thought about it before. Am curious to hear what others think. Thanks. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| A Question for Negative Collectors | Jobu | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 03-10-2017 09:49 PM |
| a question for the old time collectors | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 12-04-2008 04:56 PM |
| Question for the T-206 set collectors | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 26 | 02-03-2007 10:51 AM |
| A Question For The T206 Collectors | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 01-25-2003 08:14 PM |
| Question for collectors | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 22 | 02-10-2002 04:41 PM |
Threaded Mode