![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
After all the recent happenings what is the new safe bet? Not all low grade is unaltered but I would say most is. If this end up being the worst case scenario where de we end up?
Back to all high grade must be a scam? Low grade is not worth the cardboard it’s printed on ? Which doesn’t make sense anymore . As a collector of all eras and mostly owning low to mid grade in my vintage collection. Just wondering how this cookie crumbles as I presume most are.
__________________
Just a collector that likes to talk and read about the Hobby. 🤓👍🏼 |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
There very well could be a new emphasis on lower end cards that show honest wear and tear. I have always enjoyed those types of cards.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
IMO the new king will be cards with provenance that date it to a period before cards had such value to make restoration profitable.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I do feel bad for the collectors, but must admit I'd smile if the PSA Registry is destroyed. I've had problems that thing for years, and have seen (and pointed out) a plethora of problems, including logical/mathenatical, with its ranking system. The ranking system was bad before the PWCC revelations came out. Not to suggest that many collectors themselves don't use it for honest collecting purposes or that there's anything wrong with having a place for collectors to register and show off their collections. Last edited by drcy; 06-03-2019 at 11:25 AM. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That's a fair point, which makes provenance unfortunately less reliable unless purchased directly from the original owner and that person was known to you to be of such character as to not alter cards.
Where the provenance still would retain value to me as a 19th century collector pertains not so much as to the issue of alteration but to the issue of authenticity. If a rare card popped up out of nowhere and proof of its existence goes back only to a period when such a card already had a great value, I would be very nervous having confidence the card was real, at least not before undertaking some serious forensic analysis (that goes well beyond what any current TPG could provide). Last edited by benjulmag; 06-03-2019 at 11:40 AM. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The new king will be absolute rarity. It won't matter too much if a card is altered if there are only three total known.
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
The current mentality is the polar opposite of this, and does not take provenance into account whatsoever. The flip is all that matters to the masses. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
My 1960s complete sets hope so. ![]()
__________________
Looking for Nebraska Indians memorabilia, photos and postcards |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
There is nothing wrong with low grade. I will upgrade this if I ever see another!!
![]()
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It looks like Mickey could catch those low outside sliders and brushback fastballs with his ears. No wonder he’s in the Hall.
![]()
__________________
RAUCOUS SPORTS CARD FORUM MEMBER AND MONSTER FATHER. GOOD FOR THE HOBBY AND THE FORUM WITH A VAULT IN AN UNDISCLOSED LOCATION FILLED WITH WORTHLESS NON-FUNGIBLES 274/1000 Monster Number |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
For me, the “new king” will just be the original king - and that surrounds the fact that I like baseball and baseball history first and foremost, and other things are secondary. In comparison to many here, I have a fairly modest collection that is made up of big names in mid-grade from the postwar era, and relatively scant items prewar. But I too at times have gotten suckered into the grading minutiae, spending a lot of time deliberating whether this card for sale in a PSA 6 was really nicer than another one in a PSA 5, etc. etc. The details of the hobby for me at times have taken over for my pure love of the game and appreciation for the history and that sense of nostalgia. So if this all plays out badly, it will be a good wake-up call for me at least to think in those terms. At the end of the day, if this situation gets worse before getting better I can live with the idea of appreciating old cards for their authenticity first and foremost - even if it comes out that a much larger percentage than were know before were truly altered.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Cubs of all eras. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. Last edited by jchcollins; 06-05-2019 at 08:29 AM. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I sure as hell hope so. Nothing altered on this beauty:
![]() ![]() |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Maybe someday good old fashioned collecting, and appreciating cards for cards, will be king.
Absolutely nothing against the set (I like and collected '70s Topps) and people can do whatever they want, but way back when when I heard someone say he was going to collect the 1977 Topps entirely graded (including every common), I thought that was about the dumbest thing I had ever heard of. Though I also remember years back when someone used the term "Gem Mint" and I thought he was making a joke. Last edited by drcy; 06-05-2019 at 09:20 AM. |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I am an oddball in the hobby because I dislike old cards that are pristine. I want them to have signs of wear and signs of having survived for decades or a century. I am the same way with the comic books that I collect . if I buy a golden age comic I want it to look like some kid enjoyed it rather than someone put it up in a safe as an investment
__________________
Bill Potter T206 Beater Collection currently at 51/524 Last edited by sandmountainslim; 06-05-2019 at 11:29 AM. |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
That green Cobb is amazing. Great find.
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Cubs of all eras. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. Last edited by jchcollins; 06-05-2019 at 11:57 AM. |
#17
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I think this is definitely a possibility! Time will tell if low grade cards will take a hit, but it is possible, many will go after those more when the dust settles.
__________________
Tanner Jones - Author, Confessions of a Baseball Card Addict - Available on Amazon www.TanManBaseballFan.com |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
WTB: N162 King Kelly in low grade | Gobucsmagic74 | 19th Century Cards & ALL Baseball Postcards- B/S/T | 0 | 01-18-2018 06:33 AM |
Want To Buy N162 Goodwin King Kelly - Any Grade | chris | 19th Century Cards & ALL Baseball Postcards- B/S/T | 4 | 12-28-2009 01:05 PM |
Is this possibly unaltered? | birdman42 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 08-21-2009 06:35 PM |
Looking for lower grade (but graded) King Kelly | Archive | 19th Century Cards & ALL Baseball Postcards- B/S/T | 0 | 08-17-2005 09:07 AM |
unaltered but fake | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 06-29-2003 12:56 AM |