![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I went to a local show yesterday, in Grapevine Texas, and picked up this beauty along with 20 other raw, common T206s. Not pristine but just nice looking cards. Of course none will grade above a 4 (or so) so this isn't going to be a big time pick up. That said, we have had discussions about different alterations blah blah blah. So why not a real world one we can discuss? This card has a pencil mark on back. I have a trusty Mars plastic eraser on my desk that I will probably use on it. It isn't a crime to do that, unless you say you didn't, although some consider it sacrilegious and I can see that point too. So getting the "it is fraud" discussion out of the way, is it ok to erase this mark? If I then submit it what happens if it later gets found with the mark and then, graded, it doesn't have it? And actually, for sake of discussion, that mark might hold it back up to 2 grades!! I could see it being a 1 to 1.5 with the mark and a 2.5?-3 without it. Yikes.
![]() .
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: T206 Only Moeller Sovereign SGC 80 remains. SOLD | Thromdog | T206 cards B/S/T | 1 | 05-23-2018 05:29 AM |
Erasing a light pencil mark, altering in a negative manner? | Leon | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 45 | 06-13-2012 08:05 AM |
T206 dan moeller psa 7!! Only 2 graded higher!! | CMIZ5290 | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 2 | 12-30-2010 03:20 PM |
If if wasnt for that darn pencil mark/stain/paperloss... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 03-22-2007 05:11 PM |
Does erasing a pencil mark make a card ungradable if the erasing is apparent? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 01-20-2005 11:47 AM |