 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
02-05-2019, 03:45 PM
|
||||
|
||||
SEDiMENT IN THE PAPER STOCK
Do you think a card with a "bubble" in the stock should get a (PD) qualifier?
If yes, should this have its own qualifier for a stock flaw or lump it into (PD)? ...which is really for Print. My argument would be that it is a shame to have a Mint looking card get a PSA 6 or 7 because of a factory stock imperfection that can sometimes only be seen on an angle. Interested to hear what the community has to say...
__________________
EBAY STORE: ROOKIE-PARADE 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Photographic paper stock question. Please help | EYECOLLECTVINTAGE | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 2 | 12-14-2017 12:10 PM |
| T206 Bill Hinchman (Paper Stock) | T206Collector | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 11-28-2016 08:00 AM |
| N172 Old Judge - Thin Paper Stock (help needed) | h2oya311 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 07-07-2012 06:26 PM |
| Cracker Jack paper stock 1914 vs 1915 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 08-12-2007 08:24 PM |
| can anyone recommend good paper stock for making baseball cards? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 04-02-2007 09:29 PM |
Threaded Mode