![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
First time for me over here on the auto side. I'm not an autograph collector but I had a guy send me these photos of a Ruth. I assume everything is fake anymore but thought I'd get some education. Would enjoy your input and thanks in advance!
Rob M 20190103_192635[1].jpg 20190103_192657[1].jpg 20190103_192715[1].jpg Last edited by ramram; 01-03-2019 at 08:52 PM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
To me it appears to be one of those printed balls the stitching appears to be new. The printing on the baseball seems too good and dark. Way too many of these around now to judge without holding it in your hand.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Inclined to agree. The signature looks “okay” but without viewing it in person hard to tell. Also think the fading in the key areas of the signature is suspect. I wouldn’t chance it.
__________________
Currently seeking Sovereign 350 series backs. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Thanks guys for your input. Probably one of those Marino Special Editions I’m suspecting, lol. To me it looks like the discoloration is added as well.
Rob M |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Listen to what people are telling you. It is not a "Marino Special Edition."
The question is whether it is a printed reproduction of a genuinely signed Ruth ball. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
To me it appears to be one of those printed balls the stitching appears to be new. The printing on the baseball seems too good and dark. Way too many of these around now to judge without holding it in your hand.
Definitely agree. Although the signature is spot on, the laces are just so damn fresh and clean and new looking..... I know this sounds weird, but did you smell the ball? Does it smell new? No smell? Moldy? Believe it or not this may help. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Not in any way a Marino. Just curious why would you say that?
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If you smell what The Rock is cooking. Then you might smell if it is real or not
![]() |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Only because I just watched the recently posted video about him.
Rob M |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If it’s live ink it’s good, if not than it’s a reproduction. Can’t tell that from an image.
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
If it’s live ink it’s good, if not than it’s a reproduction. Can’t tell that from an image.
Would agree. The signature is spot on though. Just can't tell if it's real ink or a reproduction. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
DEREK JETER Experts Opinions ? | JimStinson | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 25 | 03-20-2013 04:43 PM |
Attention Pennant Experts: help / opinions needed | Bumpus Jones | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 2 | 03-20-2012 11:26 PM |
1933 Goudey Experts (Ruth), Need Opinions | joebrandon1977 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 06-17-2011 12:28 PM |
Ruth experts opinions wanted on photo | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 06-23-2008 06:18 PM |
19th century experts (Jay etc.) any opinions on this... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 25 | 12-15-2002 03:42 PM |