![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I bought a 1960 Topps Smokey Burgess online and when I received it the card looked a little smaller than the rest of the 1960 Topps cards I purchased in the same order. 2-1/2 X 3-1/2 is the standard measurements for cards in the set. I measured the Burgess and it was about 1/16th less on both measurements, very clean looking card. My question is, is there a "margin or error" on the 1960 card measurements since quality control was not the greatest back then? Can they be off by that little on both measurements? I ordered 10 other 60 Topps and they all were the standard measurement. Not a big deal but just curious if anyone has some input on this? Thanks
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1960-69 Topps Baseball 13 Card HOF Lot In Lesser Condition (closed) | moeson | Live Auctions - Only 2-3 open, per member, at once. | 8 | 03-31-2013 06:21 PM |
Trimmed card question | brett 75 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 6 | 03-21-2011 10:10 PM |
1960 Nu-Card Baseball Hi-Lites question... | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 0 | 12-15-2007 09:10 AM |
A question regarding the Mastro trimmed card thread | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 42 | 10-02-2006 11:36 AM |
Trimmed Card Question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 09-19-2005 05:46 PM |