 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
11-08-2017, 11:54 AM
|
||||
|
||||
psa 1 grading help( poor VS poor-fair)
why sometime when you see a psa graded card 1 the designation ir poor and sometime poor to fair ?
is it before the mid grade .5 ? and poor to fair is like the 1.5 now ? Last edited by g_vezina_c55; 11-08-2017 at 11:59 AM. 
|
|
#2
11-08-2017, 12:04 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#3
11-08-2017, 12:05 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
#4
11-08-2017, 01:52 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I believe the cards designated poor to fair predate the .5 system.
|
|
#6
11-08-2017, 05:06 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
so that equal the 1.5 of today ?
|
|
#7
11-08-2017, 05:33 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I would say it equals a 1 today. Of course it could be bumped to a 1.5 if resubmitted.
Edited to add some clarification. There are possible 1.5 grades in the poor-fair (1) grade because PSA did not have a 1.5 prior to implementing their .5 grades. Last edited by DeanH3; 11-08-2017 at 05:36 PM.
|
|
#8
11-08-2017, 05:45 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
i just send a e-mail to psa to ask question WHY some cards have a PR label and other PR-FR label.
|
|
#9
11-08-2017, 06:13 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Until a couple years ago, there were only whole number grades (1,2,3 etc.) PSA added the 1.5 grade then. Any card graded before then could not get a 1.5 because there WASN'T one.
Last edited by Bocabirdman; 11-10-2017 at 04:05 AM.
|
|
#10
11-08-2017, 06:47 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
There were only .5 grades added to the PSA grading system about about 2 1/2 years ago..So the card you are questioning, was likely graded before then...
|
|
#11
11-08-2017, 08:24 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Yeah, it's currently a 1, but at the time was considered Poor to Fair. That means if you send it in for "review" they could bump it to a 1.5, or even a 2. Or they could leave it a 1. They will apply the current grading standards to the card.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes.
|
|
#12
11-10-2017, 03:51 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
My answer is the correct answer
What i stated above is correct according to PSA. I knew it was but just verified to be sure. So an old grade 1 could either be poor or fair (if reevaluated)if its that important to you to find out if it deserves the .5 bump you need to pay psa to find out, the fee is dependent on the cards value.
Last edited by glynparson; 11-10-2017 at 12:09 PM.
|
|
#13
11-10-2017, 10:51 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
yeah i think its 1K for grade a mantle
|
|
#14
11-10-2017, 02:59 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Just received answer from psa
The guy from psa said to me a psa 1 pr-fr now os = to psa 1.5
|
|
#15
11-10-2017, 03:05 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#16
11-10-2017, 04:16 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
You need send for a review to know
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Grading then and now... | jchcollins | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 4 | 11-19-2015 08:44 AM |
| Card Grading vs. Autograph Grading | scooter729 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 08-20-2014 12:52 PM |
| Mint Grading, or is it the grading of mints? | brianp-beme | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 10-30-2010 09:11 AM |
| GAI Grading | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 06-03-2006 06:33 PM |
| GAI Grading | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 01-18-2003 09:50 AM |
Linear Mode
