 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
09-17-2017, 06:56 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Low Population VINTAGE Commons
I apologize in advance as I am sure this may have been asked.
Is there a basic "formula" to identify what common cards may be considered low(er) population. For example is a percentage of all graded 7 and/or 8 of the total graded a good measure? What would that number be? Any help would be appreciated. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| FS: Hoard of vintage commons 1957 to 1979 | jimivintage | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 10-25-2014 04:17 PM |
| 125+ Vintage Stars, Commons F/S $150 dlvd | mintacular | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 07-31-2012 09:04 AM |
| Vintage Commons, worth it or not | HOF Yankees | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 8 | 09-25-2009 11:48 PM |
| population reports on prewar commons vs. pricing | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 08-21-2005 10:54 PM |
| Why Population Reports On Vintage Cards Is Misleading | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 29 | 08-21-2005 07:39 PM |
Threaded Mode