![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Got this a couple days ago. I can't see any blemishes on the surface or dents or anything. The corners on this are really nice as the scans show. The only problems I see with it is that it is a little off center and there is a small printers mark on his eye. Even still, I can't see where this should be as low as VgEx. At minimum, it appears to me to be ExMt.
What are other opinions?Attachment 245904Attachment 245905
__________________
Member of OBC (Old Baseball Cards), the longest running on-line collecting club www.oldbaseball.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Is it just me or do these seem undergraded ??? | Joshchisox08 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 10-31-2015 06:33 PM |
Undergraded??? | wolfdogg | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 02-15-2013 06:51 AM |
Undergraded? | Chicago206 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 21 | 03-25-2010 01:10 AM |
Undergraded???....lets see 'em | wolfdogg | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 31 | 12-01-2009 09:38 AM |
Truly undergraded or trimmed? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 05-15-2008 09:31 AM |