![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Which back is more desirable?
__________________
Join my Cracker Jack group on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/crac...rdsmarketplace https://www.collectorfocus.com/collection/ajohnson39 *Proudest hobby accomplishment: finished (and retired) the 1914 Cracker Jack set currently ranked #12 all-time Last edited by ajjohnsonsoxfan; 05-04-2016 at 05:03 PM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
They're both common and readily available.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I lean toward the Sweet Caporal just because Piedmont 350 cards are like a hoard running roughshod over Monster land.
Brian |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
piedmont if its a wagner or plank...otherwise...neither!
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
__________________
Please PM if you are interested in Buy / Sell / Trade My eBay Store; https://www.ebay.com/str/thelumbercompanysportscards My HOF Collection; http://www.psacard.com/PSASetRegistr...t.aspx?s=77755 |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Whichever is attached to a bigger star on the front eiher wise as others have said neither though personally I prefer the Piedmont.
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Neither
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
lol
__________________
Galleries and Articles about T206 Player Autographs www.SignedT206.com www.instagram.com/signedT206/ @SignedT206 |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Though they're both about as common as ......... well people getting worked up over politics.
I'd prefer the Piedmont. I just like the way Piedmont looks. Sweet Caporal are the ugliest backs in the set to me.
__________________
429/524 Off of the monster 81% 49/76 HOF's 64% 18/20 Overlooked by Cooperstown 90% 22/39 Unique Backs 56% 80/86 Minors 93% 25/48 Southern Leaguers 52% 6/10 Billy Sullivan back run 60% 237PSA / 94 SGC / 98 RAW Excel spreadsheets only $5 T3, T201, T202, T204, T205, T206, T207, 1914 CJ, 1915 CJ, Topps 1952-1979, and more!!!! Checklists sold (20) T205 8/208 3.8% |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Are they both red Cobbs in a 3? If so, I'd go with the Piedmont. Not diamond-cut (the one aesthetic thing that will turn me off on a t206), and lower population.
If only the Sweet Cap is a Cobbie, I'd go with that one. ![]() |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Question from a game-used-bat novice | Archive | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 5 | 02-12-2008 04:11 PM |
Novice question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 03-06-2007 08:27 PM |
Question from a Grading Novice | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 09-18-2005 05:00 PM |
Reprints of Baseball cards in book - Novice question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 08-30-2005 02:37 PM |
Another novice question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 12-04-2004 06:08 AM |