![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
View Poll Results: Undergraded ??? | |||
Yes |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
6 | 11.32% |
No |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
16 | 30.19% |
Graded just right |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
31 | 58.49% |
Voters: 53. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I used to think SGC was the more consistent of the grading companies but these couple leave me scratching my head.
Thoughts ? Just added Danny Murphy MC ??? Trimmed ??? If so not sure why it got a numerical grade or even past a 10/1
__________________
429/524 Off of the monster 81% 49/76 HOF's 64% 18/20 Overlooked by Cooperstown 90% 22/39 Unique Backs 56% 80/86 Minors 93% 25/48 Southern Leaguers 52% 6/10 Billy Sullivan back run 60% 237PSA / 94 SGC / 98 RAW Excel spreadsheets only $5 T3, T201, T202, T204, T205, T206, T207, 1914 CJ, 1915 CJ, Topps 1952-1979, and more!!!! Checklists sold (20) T205 8/208 3.8% Last edited by Joshchisox08; 10-31-2015 at 03:42 PM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Devlin looks to have a small amount of paper loss on the back above the word "series". If it does no matter how small it's an incomplete card and deserves no more than a three in my opinion despite a nice front.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
That's a valid point however it's microscopic portions of the card lol.
__________________
429/524 Off of the monster 81% 49/76 HOF's 64% 18/20 Overlooked by Cooperstown 90% 22/39 Unique Backs 56% 80/86 Minors 93% 25/48 Southern Leaguers 52% 6/10 Billy Sullivan back run 60% 237PSA / 94 SGC / 98 RAW Excel spreadsheets only $5 T3, T201, T202, T204, T205, T206, T207, 1914 CJ, 1915 CJ, Topps 1952-1979, and more!!!! Checklists sold (20) T205 8/208 3.8% |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Scott looks at least like a 3.5. Delvin's a 4.
I just purchased this "4" tonight ![]()
__________________
MyStore: http://royce-classic-vintage-cards.ebid.net/ Smooth Transactions ezez420.frankbmd.northviewcats.t206hound.Beatles Guy.team-of-rivals.LukeLyon.ValKehl.Double-P-Enterprises.Hcom24.midmo.pow323.Tolstoi.WillowGrov e.Dougscats.t206Collector.cammb.pclpads.Jobu.eseho mbre.BocaBirdman, 38Goudeyman and many more |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
SGC will only give a 3 at best with paper loss. I had a NrMint Babe Ruth that I bought from a fellow board member that had a speck of paper loss on the right border and it got a 3.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The Scott could be a high 3 or low 4 I agree with Robert on the Devlin because of the paper loss.
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
If I sent those in I'd be hoping for a 4 on Devlin and a 3.5 on Scott. Nice cards no matter what the slip of paper says!
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The Hoffman has a big '44' written in blue crayon on the back. That could be the reason for the downgrade.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Maybe on the Devlin SGC 40 but otherwise spot on.
__________________
Favorite MLB quote. " I knew we could find a place to hide you". Lee Smith talking about my catching abilities at Cubs Fantasy camp. |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Each card seems to have an issue that justifies the grade. I think all three are about right.
__________________
Successful transactions with peter spaeth, don's cards, vwtdi, wolf441, 111gecko, Clydewally, Jim, SPMIDD, MattyC, jmb, botn, E107collector, begsu1013, and a few others. |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
absolutely look correctly graded. They have nice eye appeal for their grades but all have issues some fairly serious which dictates their grades. I could honestly see the Devlin getting a lower grade before i could see any of the others grading higher. I wouldn't drop over if i sent the Devlin in and got a 30 or 35.
Last edited by glynparson; 10-31-2015 at 06:01 PM. |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Thanks for the responsed.
__________________
429/524 Off of the monster 81% 49/76 HOF's 64% 18/20 Overlooked by Cooperstown 90% 22/39 Unique Backs 56% 80/86 Minors 93% 25/48 Southern Leaguers 52% 6/10 Billy Sullivan back run 60% 237PSA / 94 SGC / 98 RAW Excel spreadsheets only $5 T3, T201, T202, T204, T205, T206, T207, 1914 CJ, 1915 CJ, Topps 1952-1979, and more!!!! Checklists sold (20) T205 8/208 3.8% |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Undergraded Cards: Show Yours | GasHouseGang | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 25 | 02-02-2014 12:30 PM |
Undergraded??? | wolfdogg | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 02-15-2013 06:51 AM |
Undergraded? | Chicago206 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 21 | 03-25-2010 01:10 AM |
Undergraded???....lets see 'em | wolfdogg | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 31 | 12-01-2009 09:38 AM |
Truly undergraded or trimmed? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 05-15-2008 09:31 AM |