![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'm attempting to understand PSA's grading standard when it comes to the 'MC' qualifier. PSA states the following:
MC (Miscut): Cards that exhibit an atypical cut for the issue or ones that contain partial portions of more than one card will be designated "MC." Can anyone tell me why the Williams is not considered a miscut? Thanks for the help. (sidenote: I'm not attempting to cause an issue with the sellers of the presented cards, simply examples.)
__________________
Semper Fi |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Question about T206 miscuts | Rob D. | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 01-12-2014 07:55 PM |
Grading Question | Harliduck | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 26 | 01-10-2014 08:45 AM |
Re-grading question | ubiqty | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 06-25-2013 01:50 PM |
SGC grading question (possible dumb question) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 09-08-2006 12:36 AM |
Grading question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 02-16-2002 04:39 AM |