![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I just posted this on my blog. As far as I know, this is heretofore uncataloged.
rosar pair.jpg If I was still editor of the Standard Catalog of Baseball Cards, I'd add it to the next edition . . . and I'd credit myself with the discovery! Recently while researching a column on Buddy Rosar, I discovered that there are two distinct variations of his 1949 Leaf card, #128. On one version the triangle under his butt at the right margin is white; on the other version, the triangle is blue. There are a couple of other minor differences at that area of the card, but the blue vs. white triangle is the most obvious. On a recent day there were 47 examples of the '49 Leaf Rosar on eBay. Thirty-four of the cards were of the blue-triangle variation (72%); white-triangle cards numbered 13 (28%). I don't know if that ratio is significant enough to cause collectors to pay a premium for the scarcer white-triangle card. With its truly scarce short-prints, there aren't all that many collectors looking to complete a 1949 Leaf set, much less a master set. But I thought I'd put it out there and let the hobby decide. Rosar pair detail.jpg
__________________
My (usually) vintage baseball/football card blog: http://boblemke.blogspot.com Link to my custom cards gallery: http://tinyurl.com/customcards |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bob---if you were still editor you could have listed it as the butt triangle variation
![]() |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It looks like the triangle was behind him and then rotated and migrated downward. Corrected, yet still screwy, masking problem?
Last edited by toppcat; 03-17-2014 at 10:51 AM. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
very astute!
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
You have a good eye. I didn't see it at first glance.
__________________
Tackling the Monster T206 = 213/524 HOFs = 13/76 SLers = 33/48 Horizontals = 6/6 ALWAYS looking for T206 with back damage. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
nearly all 49 Leaf non-SPs have something similar.
There are at least 3 clearly different groups, with stuff like the Rosar, or caps that are or aren't shaded, and usually one group matches up with the pink ink cards. Weigel Brissie I have the Rosars, but no scan. The one without the triangle I have with pink ink instead of red. Mize with the yellow stripe connecting the background to the name panel comes with either red or pink. Steve B |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'm one of these idiots. Prices have been strong so there must be a few others. Wasn't very excited about this variation until I found I have one. Thanks Bob
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If it is any consolation Steve, you are not the only idiot here
Last edited by ALR-bishop; 03-29-2014 at 08:46 PM. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yep, far from the only one.
I only pick up a couple now and then, but I really like the set and plan on going for as close to a master set of the non-sps as I can get. I don't have any Sps yet. Maybe a few eventually. Steve B |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1949 Leaf Ruth variation??? or slabbed reprints???? | fkw | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 12-05-2018 05:10 AM |
Possible newly discovered T205 variation | marcdelpercio | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 65 | 12-12-2016 04:30 PM |
Newly Discovered 52Topps Variation!! | Cardboard Junkie | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 4 | 03-21-2013 06:42 AM |
1965 Topps Transfers -- New Variation Discovered | ChrisStufflestreet | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 5 | 06-18-2010 05:59 AM |
1949 Leaf Variation? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 31 | 02-08-2009 09:02 PM |