stretch

[thehoodedcoder]

isn't this a bit of a stretch for an lot title?

http://www.hugginsandscott.com/cgi-b...l?itemid=63340

it doest even mention it is bowerman card in the title.

kevin

[DixieBaseball]

While possibly true, who would want to own two small light/faint blue marks from the potential back of a Wagner card? Never could be proved and if it was, all you have is a 1/16th of a Wagner back. Ridiculous. I wouldn't pay $50 for it. Anywho, this is not only a stretch, but reaches on crack levels of description.

[thehoodedcoder]

now every miscut bowerman is a partial wagner back. lol. the only way that gets funnier is if they put the primary picture as the back like people with rare backs do in their ebay listing.

if that was my card i would probably be pissed about that and get it corrected.

kevin

[wheitman]

This is just about as ridiculous as it gets. Makes me wish someone had shot me before I published "T206 The Monster"

Bill Heitman

[Peter_Spaeth]

Originally Posted by wheitman

This is just about as ridiculous as it gets. Makes me wish someone had shot me before I published "T206 The Monster"

Bill Heitman

LOL, great comment.

[atx840]

I had a great chat with the owner of this card at National. My thoughts are the players on the strip do appear to be from the same sub grouping for the 150 series (minus Wagner) but no way to really know that the strip order was used in production.

Definitely a stretch

[the 'stache]

[ullmandds]

Well Huggins and Scott DOES have a sterling reputation!

[the-illini]

Originally Posted by ullmandds

Well Huggins and Scott DOES have a sterling reputation!

+1

[calvindog]

blah blah blazey blah. blabber. stop complaining and do something about it. where do I send my $20 check so you can sue h & s in small claims court and turn it into an indictment so I don't have to hear about it anymore. your got nothing. blah.

jeff