![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm sure most of you saw this auction while it was up, I bid low because I wasn't convinced that the Mcgraw wasn't altered. I was pretty sure it was miscut, but not sure enough to warrant that sale price (im in college).
![]() Both with Tolstoi backs. I'm curious to hear what the opinions of some other more experienced collectors are. Last edited by TobaccoKing4; 12-01-2011 at 06:03 PM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I think it's trimmed. Some corners rounded, others sharp.
But with a Tolstoi back it's still interesting.
__________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/calvindog/sets Last edited by calvindog; 12-01-2011 at 07:31 PM. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tough to tell from that picture. It's a bit shorter than the Maloney, but not by a whole lot. The lower corners being worn more than the top isn't outside what I'd be comfortable with, as the bottom would be against the bottom of a box if it was stored standing up. That close to the name I'd think the lower edge was trimmed, but that's the one that looks ok.
If I had it in hand I could tell, but not from that picture. Did they have a back picture too? Sometimes that view makes trimming clearer. As a Tolstoi it's interesting, but you'd have to balance how likely trimming was against your interest and budget. Another concern for later on is wether it's got enough size to get a numeric grade if it isn't trimmed. I'm thinking it may be just a bit too short either way. Probably not worth the risk for a college student, but for someone with a few bucks to risk and a bit of gambler in them maybe. I try to avoid bidding a lot on cards that look at all suspect unless it really looks great. And even then I bid pretty low. Steve B |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The McGraw looks like a good card to me. Full size. It's hard to detect a slight trim from ebay scans, though. Probably a good one to have gambled on if it was going cheap and you like those type of gambles. I try to buy some cards raw and see what the grading companies think of them. Usually most of the cards get a grade, but a few are rejected. SGC might not mark it down very much for the miscut. Might get an SGC 50. PSA would give it an mc for sure, perhaps a PSA 4mc but those are just wild guesses based on the front of the card only.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I did have a conservative bid in at only $70, $75 with shipping. But it ended up at about $150.
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
POLL: Trimmed Card Prices | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 63 | 12-22-2005 09:06 AM |
Who buys trimmed cards? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 22 | 12-06-2005 07:27 PM |
Trimmed Cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 57 | 09-08-2005 04:16 PM |
N172 Hines - trimmed and/or miscut? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 02-17-2005 09:00 AM |
Help with Trimming and The real price for trimmed cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 12-17-2004 04:49 PM |