About how would these cards grade?

[zljones]

I was told the Hank Greenberg is in "Good" condition; however, I have concerns because of the stamp on the back. The Greenberg is crease free but there is some chipping on the front. I am torn whether this is in "Fair" or "Good" condition.

I have a hard time grading T205s myself. I won this Clarke on ebay for cheap, as if it was going as "Good" condition, but I kinda think it might be VG.

[MW1]

Clarke -- "Good" due to well-rounded corners. It also appears that there may be a few minor creases on the obverse including one near the UR corner.
Greenberg -- "Fair" due to corner wear, stamp, and back damage (I'm assuming the white marks on the front of the card are from a photographic reflection. If the white marks on the back are of a similar nature, perhaps the card would grade as high as "good").

[zljones]

The only white mark on the front that is from the photo flash is the one near the "Lou Gehrig Says...." part, the rest are the same type of wear as the back, seems like natural wear. Thanks for the input

[dstraate]

Same with above. My guess is a 1.5 for the Goudey and 2 for the T205. Too much chipping and rough corners for a 3.

[bcbgcbrcb]

Agree with the others

[smtjoy]

Nice cards, I would guess-

T205 Clarke- 40/3

Goudey Greenberg- 20/1.5 or PSA 3 (MK)