![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Hi,
I am curious to the groups thoughts on OC and other qualifiers. For example: baseball bowman 3_0001.jpg The card on the left is a PSA 7 with a (OC) qualifier. The right is a PSA 6. I agree with the sentiment of buy the card not the holder (I like the PSA 6 more than the 7 personally), but I am curious as to what would be the no qualifier equivalent? I.e. typically a PSA X is generally has the same value as a PSA 7 (OC)? Or is this the case where it just depends on the specific circumstances? Thanks, Jim |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I think its very hard to make a specific rule for qualifiers because of the variance in severity of the qualifiers and the starting point of the grade (a qualified 5 might not have the same impact as a qualified 8).
But the rule of thumb Ive often heard is "two grades lower" for value equivalent. But thats a really broad rule. And my overall opinion on qualifiers- I hate them. Qualifiers tell me what a card "would have graded" and never get around to telling me what a card "is actually graded". But thats just me. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Rule of thumb I believe is to drop 2 grades. PSA 7 (oc) would be a PSA 5 etc..
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
For the registry sets, it counts 2 grades below your listed grade. So the 6 is a 6 and the 7 would be a 5 if you put them in a graded registry on PSA's website. When people talk about their GPA for the set, that's how it is averaged. Prices seem to drop between 2-3 grades for any qualifier, from what I've seen.
So your 7(OC) may only sell around a 4.5 or so. Now if the card is modern, OC can really kill the value. Just because there's so many of them made, why grade/buy one that has a major flaw?
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Thank you all for your thoughts! Much appreciated.
__________________
Actively building a 1953 Bowman Color PSA Registry Set (Currently 150/160) and attempting a 1947 Tip Top Bread Set. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My least favorite thing about PSA are the qualifiers. I totally agree with the other poster who referenced the severity of OC cards playing a big part. Some cards are borderline OC and still carry good value with the more severe OC cards being effected more from a value perspective.
I have more PSA cards in my collection than any of the other graders but I prefer SGC b/c they don't mess with qualifiers. Last edited by Hammerin'Hank; 01-13-2015 at 08:47 AM. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'd take the 6 all day long over the 7Q. They are virtually the same card w/ the T-B reversed. Q's bug the hell out of me and I avoid them if at all poss.
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Thumb movie | Leon | Boxing / Wrestling Cards & Memorabilia Forum | 1 | 12-05-2013 05:41 PM |
Looking to buy 1938 Goudey Big League Thumb Movies | alanu | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 08-10-2011 09:35 AM |
need info cal ripken thumb of gold card | gsr67 | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 4 | 05-09-2010 06:28 PM |
N-Album pages, Goudey Thumb Movies, other prewar | Archive | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 0 | 02-29-2008 09:07 AM |
FS Goudey Thumb Movies - Price Reduced | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 02-27-2008 02:56 PM |