![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Now, I have only been collecting vintage baseballs for a few years now, and have never spotted a Young, Lynch, or Tener National league Ball. A few months ago, I was lucky to see another gentleman on here come away with a Pulliam ball and that was exciting to see. Do any of you fellas have any of these balls, That would be really cool to see them on here.
__________________
"Baseball was, is and always will be to me the best ballgame in the world"...BR |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Are these balls that rare that no one has any? I wonder if the Gentleman that purchased the Pulliam ball would grace this thread with a few pics of his ball?...
__________________
"Baseball was, is and always will be to me the best ballgame in the world"...BR |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
If I did this correctly, you should see a Lynch baseball. In 1951, Spalding reproduced a Young stamp that I can post at another time; I have doubts, however, that Spalding ever produced a Young stamp. I have several 1880s-1890s Spalding baseballs (including one with a Spalding box with a Young stamp), but none of the baseballs have Young's stamp.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Wow ! This is the first time that I have ever seen a " Lynch " ball. I dont think many collectors have ever seen one. This is a fantastic peice of history and I thank you for showing it.
__________________
"Baseball was, is and always will be to me the best ballgame in the world"...BR |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
These are from Dave, the owner of a Pullium ball. Fantastic baseball. Thanks for sharing it Dave.
__________________
"Baseball was, is and always will be to me the best ballgame in the world"...BR |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I believe this ball was produced by Spalding in 1951. Again, I have never seen evidence Spalding actually stamped baseballs with his signature during his tenure (1885-1902).
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Wow, thats still a pretty special ball none the less. How did you come by both of your baseballs? ( Lynch & Young )
__________________
"Baseball was, is and always will be to me the best ballgame in the world"...BR |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
but those balls look too good to be true (that's what she said).....are these the famous PastimeBaseballs knock-offs?
http://www.pastimebaseballs.com/ |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I dont think a true collector would want anything that wasn't original and real. To be honest with you, maybe its just ignorance, but I never even knew that this site/company exsisted. How can you tell whether a vintage ball is legit nowadays?
__________________
"Baseball was, is and always will be to me the best ballgame in the world"...BR |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I just went to the website that Shoeless Moe posted, and im a little depressed now. How can you tell whether a ball you are buying or have purchased is legit?
__________________
"Baseball was, is and always will be to me the best ballgame in the world"...BR |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Skepticism is good. I don't think I could have been any clearer, though, that the Young stamp is not period. I believe it was created for the 75th anniversary of the National League. The Lynch baseball is the real thing; if you see it in person, you will have no doubt about it.
This discussion does raise a larger issue: how can you tell any baseball is vintage? It is becoming more and more difficult with several companies producing baseballs for "vintage base ball" leagues. I have used x-rays to date baseballs, since they allow you to get a good idea of what the core looks like. The stitches and the pattern of the stitching holes can also tell you quite a bit about the date of manufacture. |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I find these products concerning--especially when the web site shows you how the baseballs will look when aged. The earlier models are easy to tell from vintage baseballs (I am afraid to point out the differences for fear the company will adjust how they are made); later models may be difficult or impossible. Provenance will become increasingly important.
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
this is what pisses me off. these baseballs should be marked to show they are new. but someone is always a step ahead.
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I agree, they should be marked somehow. They can make their baseballs look like they are original over 100 years old. Its sickening. And I dont know enough about what to look for to determine its validity. Is there a book or some sort of trick anyone can give me? Email me if neccessary, pm me...
__________________
"Baseball was, is and always will be to me the best ballgame in the world"...BR |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
PastimeBaseballs replied to a Net54 members inquiry and per them anyone who can't tell the difference between a real one and one of theirs has issues. So while it wasn't the kindest response, if they speak the truth maybe it is fairly easy to tell the difference if u had both in hand. That being said that aging process of their makes them look at first glance pretty realistic. I am not going to support them to compare the 2, but perhaps you should if you are a ball collector so u can see if it's obvious or not.
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Vintage Minor League Baseball Cards? | Jayworld | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 12-07-2010 01:49 PM |
Buzz Arlett???? | quinnsryche | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 20 | 11-07-2010 05:04 PM |
For sale: Vintage Ivy League Track Photos 1921-22 | GrayGhost | Everything Else, Football, Non-Sports etc.. B/S/T | 1 | 03-23-2010 10:33 PM |
Vintage minor league player stats | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 03-04-2005 04:36 PM |
1906 Cubs National League Pennant Postcard | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 03-08-2004 09:25 PM |