![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I recently purchase a small group of cards that contained one E121-80 card (that I needed for my collection) and tw0 E121-120 cards (which I don't collect and are shown below). As I was looking a bit closer today I noticed that the card stock on the E121-120 is much thinner that anything that I have in my E121-80 collection. Are all E121-120 cards on thinner stock? Do these look good?
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How many people accept the T200 Cleveland card as their J. Jax card? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 12-25-2007 11:04 AM |
Show us your baseball card related stock certificates | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 12-15-2006 10:22 PM |
Original 1909 Piedmont Pack and T-206 Card Shadow Box | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 11-05-2006 07:23 AM |
A question regarding the Mastro trimmed card thread | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 42 | 10-02-2006 11:36 AM |
I realize that our opinions may differ regarding what constitutes a baseball card | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 09-10-2006 01:42 PM |