 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
07-03-2010, 12:34 PM
|
||||
|
||||
How Ridiculous
PSA has come out with their 2010 registry awards and the second best 1914 Cracker Jack set has received the "Best Vintage Pre-War Baseball Set of the Year" award. How can this be? The best set, owned by Peter Garcia, is missing four cards, but has a set rating of 6.15. The winning set, owned by PSA multi-award winner Don Spence, has a set rating of 5.19. The 6.15 set rating for Peter's set assumes no value for the four missing cards and, even with this penalty, it is still almost a full grade better than Don's set. Does this make sense to anyone here? Say it ain't so, Joe.
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Thinking about starting another ridiculous e107 project...someone talk me out of it | shammus | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 08-31-2009 11:06 AM |
| Willing to pay ridiculous money for Rose Co. PC hall of famers | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 09-21-2007 07:15 PM |
| paying ridiculous money for a d304 or an e103 Tenny | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 08-06-2007 12:43 PM |
| will pay ridiculous prices for an e103 Tenny, Chance or Chase | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 05-05-2007 06:41 PM |
| This is getting ridiculous | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 11-27-2003 07:24 AM |
Threaded Mode