![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dan Koteles
That's right. The Tigers getting Miguel Cabrera and Dontrell WIllis makes this one of baseballs greatest teams ever .Watch the run production this year, it will be sick .The year maybe over for ALL TEAMS!!!!!....thank the good LORD for my seats....10 behind 1st base on the aisle. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Steve
Not many American kids playing ML ball anymore. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Ben
The Tigers got Miggy Cabrera? HOLY SH*T. Likely the best young hitter in baseball. He's gonna explode in that lineup with such great protection. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: barrysloate
Did the Tigers get Willis and Cabrera today? Wow, that's a big deal. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dan Koteles
also ,CHiSOx mgr Ozzie Guillen stated he'd seen Cabrera. He is eating the right things working out and has never seen him look better .This really is a very intimidating lineup....wowie ! |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: barrysloate
So Dan, who did the Tigers give up to get them? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Ben
Easily a top 3 lineup in baseball, probably #1 assuming they gel early on. I think the batting order will look something like this: |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: paulstratton
Giving up Maybin, A.Miller and 4 other prospects is a stiff price...but worth it IMO. The whole lineup can rake! Let's hope the pitching stays healthy. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Seth B.
Ben, being a Braves fan, I think if Renteria is healthy, you gotta bat him second over Polanco! |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: jerms
when the red sox get johan--they will be the team to beat |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: barrysloate
That is a pretty wicked line up. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
I know who "pudge" is... |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jeff Lichtman
The top two prospects the Tigers gave up have a lot of potential -- but how can they possibly measure up to Cabrera and Willis? Great trade for the Tigers. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: quan
if the tigers can sign MCAB to a long term contract i'd say it's a great deal for the tigers. seems like the marlins wanted to dump dontrelle's salary also. angels/dodgers must be pissed as they probably could've offered better deals/prospects. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dan Koteles
QUan....the Leyland and DOmbrowski connection had alot to do with it. The DOdgers or Angels didnt have the prospects as the Tigers. Maybin was ranked the #1 player. They say he has the all the Bonds tools w/o the roids. You should see him run.Seriously, he has an extra gear with arms flailing all over the place. He will steal 50 and hit over 30 hr's....just not sure what average he will hit. Miller 98-100mph lefty. BArry, they gave 4 other prospects as well. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: cmoking
it sounds like you are excited and a Tiger's fan, congrats on the great trade. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jon Canfield
While I do think the Tigers are top 3, I don't think their run production will be #1 next year - IMHO. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: quan
yea maybin is REALLY good...maybe not a superstar prospect like a couple others but miller is not considered an elite pitching prospect like kershaw in la or joba/bucholz. i think the dodgers refusal to trade kemp/kershaw broke that deal and marlins wanted maybin instead of an if like kendrick or wood made the tigers the lucky sob |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jimi
Ok, so what's the Top 3 teams now? I vote these in no particular order: |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jimi
.....notice no National League team in my top 3. |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jeff Lichtman
Two thoughts: 1) The Sox with Johan is the best team in baseball; 2) the Dodgers do have the prospects: Loney, Kemp, Kershaw, Billingsley, etc. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dan Koteles
Willis doesnt make us the best , the overall will and your bet is on.Wrong choice of words.SInce you didnt put the line-up-up, here goes. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dan Koteles
the Tigers were the Top run producers in both leagues last year .SO now add Renteria and Cabrera over Inge and Thames/Monroe ? |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: quan
it all starts with pitching and boston will be sick good if they get johan! channelling john buccigross...johan/beckett is to boston what lennon/mccartney was to the beatles??? |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dan Koteles
I do agree with you on Santana and the SOx.TIgers will rest assure make the playoffs and out hit everyone. The SOx WILL NOT have the greatest hitting lineup ever....the Tigers have a real possibility of having the greatest hitters on a team at one time ever. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: cmoking
Dan, I can see you are really excited, and you should be! I was just razzing you and having some fun. The Tigers won't be a lock, but they surely will be up there with the Yankees and Red Sox as favorites to win the whole thing. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dan Koteles
you are an EBAY trader and Iam a barbs trader, it's all good ! |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Anonymous
on paper tigers? |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Brett
Just imagine the Red Sox after they get Santana |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Alan U
Better hope Cabrera doesn't weigh 400 lbs. when he comes to spring training |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dan Koteles
see for yourself and then add 320 and 332 to the lineup |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Mark
The Cabrera pickup is huge, and the Tigers will likely be amazing, but in terms of a "Starting 8" the team to beat is still the '76 Reds. |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: howard
I just looked up the '76 Reds, Mark. That was some serious dominance. They also destroyed the competition in the post-season, including a sweep of my Yankees. I think their offense was better than the current Tigers although I would take Miggy over Rose. BTW, Did you know their hitters also led in Ks? Goes to show how that stat can be misleading. |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Anonymous
One fo baseballs greatest teams ever? |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Brian
As a yanks fan, I am going to be the first in line at the humble pie eating contest. With this move, the tigers become on of the more powerful and age balanced teams in recent history. Their offense will be amazing, if the pitching stays healthy, they will be VERY difficult. Depending what the sox give up for Santana, they could be a team for the history books, dual aces in the rotation, and young to boot has given any die hard yankee fan a twitch in their eye. |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: joe
This looks like a great trade. I really got tired of Inge's at bats. I just hope they don't try to put Cabrero in left field and leave Inge at third as writer Tom Gage implied in todays paper. |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jim VB
<<ROgers- Verlandrer and WIllis have been 20 game winners .>> |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: J Levine
Unfortunately, pitching wins world series in my opinion and I think the Tigers are weak there. Dontrelle might have a little bump this year but not enough. Rogers is chronically hurt. Verlander has the potential of being hurt ala Kerry Wood and Mark Prior. Their bullpen is not what it used to as well, their middle relief is suspect (although, I think it will be better than last year). Let us not forget that Renteria, Sheffield, Pudge, and Polanco are aging and apt to be hurt. There are no sure things in baseball (I remember this exact discussion on the Cubs a few years ago...Wood, Prior, Rameriez, Soriano, Lee, etc.). |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: peter chao
A lot also depends on Pudge Rodgriguez. For a catcher he had a great year at the bat, however, 2007 is below his normal standards. |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: howard
I don't think Pudge is much of a force any more and as a catcher at his age it is very likely that his decline will continue. He had his worst offensive season in about fifteen years (below .300 OBP) and had his worst season throwing out base stealers. |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: James Gallo
First off, no way can you say this is one of the greatest teams ever especially before they have even taken the field. |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: howard
James, Dan is just an excited fan and he overstated the Tiger case a bit. Looking at your post I see you did the same with the Phillies. No big deal that's what fans do. |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Ben
Phillies have a great offense too, but aside from Hamels, I dont see their starting pitching being good enough to go all the way. Their relief pitching is questionable too. Lidge has great stuff but he's not the lights out closer he was for that 2-3 year period a few years ago. We know all too well about the struggles he's had with his mental approach to the game. Are they converting Myers back to a SP, or are they still going to run him out in relief? (could never understand why they did that in the first place). |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dan Koteles
you arent even close in anything.This team has all 9 to hit 300. No team in the game has ever had that,yes....not even the great Yankee teams. I play and follow baseball more intensive then most on this board.This team could set a run scoring record, watch and see.There are a couple of post here just for chits and giggles...crap talk is all it is. There are 4 batting titles on this team.And 6 have hit over 330 in their span. |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: paulstratton
The Phillies play in a "bandbox", of course their numbers will look better on the surface. The Sox haven't gotten Santana yet..he may not go anywhere. |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Wil Jordan
It looks like an older version of the Florida Marlins. Before they can be called a great team they need to win something. The questions I have are can they beat the Red Sox? Will the pitching hold up--because when it gets right down to winning a world series it is always about piching not hitter. |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: peter chao
Switching leagues is going to help Dontrelle Willis. The AL hasn't seen much of Dontrelle's unique pitching motion, he should win between 15-20 games next year. |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: shane leonard
What an awesome trade the Tigers did with the Marlins. Yes, the Marlins got two great players in Maybin and Miller, but Cabrera is the real deal. I agree with perhaps batting Renteria 2nd vs. 8th. He has much more power than Polanco and is a threat to steal than Polanco. Polanco is more a contact hitter which would be better served in the 8 hole or nine hole to allow the big boys to hit him in. |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: JimCrandell
Shane, |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Ricky Y
Now that's a scary lineup! The Tigers (Dombrowski) did a great job in putting that team together in such a short time. Now if BoSox can get Santana ... I'd pay to see that series... |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Help With 1920's Detroit Tigers Jersey- | Archive | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 13 | 10-18-2008 10:15 AM |
looking for detroit tigers autographs | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 02-22-2008 02:11 PM |
Detroit Tigers postcard....year?? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 04-08-2007 06:26 AM |
Looking for a few M116 Detroit Tigers | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 1 | 05-12-2006 07:02 AM |
Wanted: E120 Detroit Tigers | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 01-01-2005 06:24 AM |