![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Joe D.
with the 'N' cards, it would appear that the 'N' stands for 'n'ineteenth century. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Ed Hans
I don't think that Burdick ever used the "N" prefix when he developed his classification system. Nineteenth century cards were simply known by their assigned numbers; "172", "300" etc. The prefix was added by later chroniclers for the sake of consistency. I believe that the "T" prefix was always meant to stand for "tobacco". |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
Burdick didn't use "N" for nineteenth century tobacco he used it for an international issue, I believe. Bert Sugar put the N in Nineteenth century. I think Burdick did use T for twentieth century tobacco cards... |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: barrysloate
I don't believe there is a single known card which uses the "T" designation that didn't come with some tobacco product. Also, there are no pre-1900 "T" cards. So in a sense it happens to stand for both. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: MVSNYC
as far as i always knew, "T" stands for "twentieth century tobacco cards" |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Frank Wakefield
From my copy of The American Card Catalog, 1960. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
Frank my friend. Keep looking in the ole ACC and you will see Burdick did NOT use N for 19th century tobacco. He used N for other issues....maybe South America? He only used a number for 19th century and no prefix letter....take care |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Joe D.
is if the 'tobacco' portion was an afterthought. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Paul S
If T is for Twentieth Century and tobacco cards, why aren't Twentieth Century candy cards TE? Just curious |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
Burdick started the ACC numbering system and I always go to his writings first. E was for Early gum and candy cards.... |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Paul S
I should probably do more of my own research on that side of the hobby. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: fkw
In the ACC "N" was originally used for Central and South American Tobacco. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Frank Wakefield
Well now, Leon... I conceed that Mr. Burdick grouped other stuff in with N. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
It's no big issue...it's just cards. I am pretty sure that Bert Sugar gave the N designation to Nineteenth century tobacco cards....take care |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Frank Wakefield
Since you have all of those N cards... maybe you could dig around and find me what I think of as an N1 American Editors of Henry Waterson. About Good is enough for me... |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Ryan Christoff
I think N561 is the only South American baseball issue with the "N" designation. At least that I'm aware of. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Ryan Christoff
Sorry to bump this thread, but I just wanted to clarify what I was saying since I did receive an e-mail question about it. My point was that N was not for Central and South American issues, but obviously included Cuba as noted by the N230-3 and N258 issues. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Frank Wakefield
From Mr. Burdick's "special index" on page 4... |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SGC grading question (possible dumb question) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 09-08-2006 12:36 AM |
Player question & a set question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 11-13-2004 06:41 PM |