![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Double-P-Enterprises
Unless I'm mistaken, this is an E220 National Caramel and worth considerably more than an E121 (I believe it sold accurately however). Would look much nicer in an SGC holder once labeled accurately |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Matt
It is a trimmed E220. If anyone wants to give me $520 for my trimmed E220 Cobb, consider it sold. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Brad
Matt, |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Steve
Isn't that the same company that had the over graded PSA 6? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Matt
From my memory, the borders looked thin - on checking, it probably is fine and just a diamond cut. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: marty quinn
with creases looking like a road map and some nice vintage wear what should the "accurate" grade be? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Rob Dewolf
Marty, |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: marty quinn
ahha! correct rob, my oops! the way psa holders some cards is disgusting, did ya see the psa colgans, terrible! |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: boxingcardman
is that the card says "National Caramel Company" right on the back. Nevermind the fine distinctions between American and National cards, just read the darn thing! |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Rich Klein
This is the 2nd card in a week that he's put up for sale that was mis-identified or badly graded. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Frank Wakefield
Realistically, most collectors would have had a good chance at properly identifying this card if it had not been slabbed. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Anonymous
I am the buyer of this card that is mislabeled by PSA. You gentlemen are too good at catching things a novice would not even notice. The question I have for you is since it is mislabeled do I have to buy it? I was a seller in a similar incident and I absorbed the loss and relisted even though it technically was not my error. This seller told me it was not his fault and I am obligated to buy the Cobb. What is the consensus on this. Thanks for any advice bruce Kasarda |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Frank Wakefield
2 different answers... |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
E220's are far scarcer than E121's and I wouldn't doubt that an E220 Cobby is worth more than an E121. Not sure about your question as to being obligated to buy it. BTW, I sent you an email concerning some cards and not sure if you got it?.....take care |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: bigfish
I think you should buy the card for the price listed. You did well on that purchase and the e220 is a scarcer than the e121. I will trade you my psa 8 N172 Sage and Dick Van Dyke towards it. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Sen. Russell's collection incl. Doyle error & Ty Cobb back | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 73 | 07-19-2012 09:05 AM |
1910 E93 Ty Cobb PSA 3 Weird Error! Look it's Leach | Archive | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 0 | 05-10-2008 10:12 AM |
The Catch 22 of this board | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 06-17-2005 06:09 PM |
PSA error in 1913 Nat'l Game Set: "Cobb" | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 02-17-2004 03:26 AM |
Catch up on required reading | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 10-23-2003 08:41 AM |