![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: joe
Leon said I could post something on this EBAY transaction/Problem? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: pas
He won the card and paid for it, you are obligated to sell it to him. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: barrysloate
Are you thinking of pocketing the $400 as a way to recover part of your money? Sounds reasonable on the surface, but there may be something illegal about it. But what other recourse do you have? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Brian
Show him the character and class he didn't show you -- return the money. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: DMcD
"But what other recourse do you have?" |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Mark L
Do you risk anything by revealing the name of this dirtbag? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dave F
I would just refund him his money..and drop him a note refreshing his memory or what happened a few years ago..."because you chose not to be a stand up seller at that time, here is your money back. I also hope I don't have anything else for sale you'll ever be interested in, because your now officially on my blocked bidder's list. Have a great day." |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Paul S
Brian's right, because if you don't then you become one of "them". However, if you can't bring yourself to do that then do what David describes. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Shawn Chambers
Joe, |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Al Simeone
Joe, |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: joe
Hello guys, thanks for the posts to this problem. The name of the person is Brooks Newell, San Antonio Texas. In my last note to him , he said he was tired of beating a dead horse because this was a few years ago. Well he got my money, I got a counterfeit card. That's my dead horse. Some on this board know him. Someone said he has problems with his eye sight, still no reason for the original problem. Barry, I was not planning on keeping the money, but I want to make him get the money back himself. it should not be easy for him to screw me and not suffer any repercussions. There is no easy way to get solutions to some of these EBAY problem sellers. I originally contacted EBAY, USPS, and some other Government offices to get a solution with no avail. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Brian
Show him the character and class he didn't show you -- return the money. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Mike
I've never been cheated out of such a large sum of money, but I can only hope I'd show the same character and maturity if facing a similar situation. I think Joe is handling the situation absolutely perfect. In my book, if someone has cheated you in the past, you have no obligation to assist them in any way. If the guy is stupid enough to bid on an item from someone he has cheated in the past, he should expect some inconveniences. Joe, absolutely don't sell this guy a card he wants, and don't lift a finger helping him get his "unearned" money back. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Brian
I wouldn't sell him the card either. But I would return the money with no hassles. Two wrongs don't make a right, right? |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: David Vargha
Ship him back his counterfeit card and use USPS shipping confirmation. That proves delivery. He is then screwed under PayPal rules. Tell PayPal that he must have switched the card. Don't put anyting in writing to him that he can use against you. Tell him that you know that you shipped the right thing and can't believe that he is trying to pull a fast one on you. Let the weasel get some of his own medicine. (Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.) |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Brian
Or you could do that. Vargha, you always bring a fresh perspective. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jim VB
Dave V., |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Bill
ok let me get this straight. you bought a card. years later, you try to get it graded, and comes back counterfeit. now you want the money back. i would have to agree with the seller on this one. you purchased the card, with no written guarantee its authentic. it was poor judgement on your part for buying a fake. if you are willing to spend $1200 for a card you don't no is 100% real this is a problem. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: David Vargha
Several years ago, I sold a 1952 Bowman Mantle (raw) card for about $600 on eBay. About one year later, the buyer wrote back that it was a counterfeit. I refunded his money without question and apologized. I then contacted the person who had sold it to me some nine months before I had resold it, informing him that it was a fake. He refunded my money without question and apologized. How does the passage of time negate responsibility on the part of the seller? |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: joe
T206 king, I had the card graded within 1 month of receiving the card, not years later. That's what the 1st transaction was all about. |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Alan
Joe - |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Lee Behrens
Peter S., By no means does anyone have to sell a card to the winner in an ebay auction. That's the way it's suppose to work but not the law. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Adam
I would send that person a home-made counterfeit version of whatever card you sold him for $400. Just get some paper, cut it into the size of the card, and get a few markers and take a solid 10 minutes or so to "create" the card. If it ends up looking kind of like a child's drawing, that's perfectly fine. Then mail that "card" to him along with a postive note inside the package, something along the lines of "Congratulations on winning! Please leave positive feedback and I will do the same!" |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: anthony
when i first started reading the replies, i was thinking of the same exact thing that david was thinking. f&*k 'em! |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: barrysloate
I know Brooks as he is a customer. I've never had a problem with him, and Joe's outcome surprises me. I know that he does have some vision problems, but that has nothing to do with the issue. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: scott brockelman
Thought I might add a bit to this thread as I have known Brooks for many years and sold him a lot of nice cards. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: peter chao
Joe, |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Tony Andrea
Brian's first response say's it best in my opinion. Tony |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dan Bretta
Someone who is legally blind and still has the passion to collect should at least have someone look his high dollar cards over before he sells them on ebay. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: dennis
1 question: is it that good of a reprint?....how about a scan. old saying,one picture is worth a thousand words. |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: joe
Here is scan with SGC response, next day return and original ebay listing with description. The one think I did notice when I received the card is has a lacquer finish on both sides. Sorry if scans are to large. |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: dennis
thanks for the auction,i would think the seller should refund w/o question. the laquer finish you mentioned should seal the deal that it is the same card and a tell tale sign. |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: scott brockelman
It appears the card is actually real. I think SGC missed the call on counterfeit, although it probably has been coated with something, either lacquer, shellac or glue, from the scan it certainly looks ok and I can see why Joe bid on it and why Brooks thought it was ok. |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: boxingcardman
Then in court you can prove your case, he can prove his and you end up with a net $800. |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: dennis
what scott said could be true but maybe they(sgc) meant to check the altered box and checked the counterfit by mistake. i would certainly send it back and see what happens as the card looks ok in the scan. |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jeff Lichtman
I'm so upset about all of this. First some scumbag rips off a blind guy. And then a blind guy rips off Joe. And now everyone wants to help Joe rip off the blind guy who ripped off Joe but who surely got ripped off by the scumbag. Third base! |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Steve
That Cobb is pretty close, but certainly counterfeit. |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Bill
Read the auction, doesnt say 100% authentic. buyers fault! |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Brett
I don't understand how this is the sellers fault. The seller never said in the auction that the card is 100% authentic ! He just states that its a t205 Cobb card. If you weren't 100% sure of it being authentic, then you shouldn't have bid on the card... espcially if its $1200. Sorry if this sounds harsh, but if someone is willing to spend $1200 on a card that he/she doesn't know if its real, than you shouldn't be bidding on prewar baseball cards. |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jeff Lichtman
I'm sure I'm just a bit tired but are you guys serious? If a seller advertises a card as a T205 he also has to say 100% authentic too in order for the buying public to understand it is not a fake? Do you think the seller might have assumed that a buyer spending $1200 on a card presumed that the card was real and not a ten cent fake? If the card is advertised as a T205 it is presumed authentic unless there is a disclaimer included in the listing. If the card is a fake it is NOT a T205. |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: dennis
tough crowd... if you are an HONEST seller any buyer should assume a card listed as this (1909 t206, 1933 goudey etc)listed in the proper catagory is buying a legit card. it does not have to be slabbed to be real. |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Steve
People that support crooked sellers scare me... By listing in the Pre-1930 category, isn't it a reasonable assumption that the item is Pre-1930. Get a clue |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: joe
Does anyone know if anyone from SGC reads this board? It's difficult for me to believe that SGC would mark the wrong box on this one. But, if they did and someone from SGC can look at the scan, I would be happy to send it back to them for another look if they think there is a chance for a grade or authenticate. I see 1 from the board says definitly not real and another thinks it is real. |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
Many, if not all, of the guys at SGC read this board....I thought the card looked good too but I have been fooled before. Also, I am in the minority but if someone sold me a fake and it was not refunded then I would consider the newest issue as partial payment for their not making good on it. I also consider Brooks a good guy and a friend...but this was not handled well, imo. A refund should have been given. He should have got the card back and dealt with it on his end. regards |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: barrysloate
Joe- my gut is they checked the wrong box. The card looks real but with a slight trim to the bottom border. Maybe they were distracted and just made a mistake. |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Rick McQuillan
Some thoughts - |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Steve
I would send it in to GAI (are they still in business)? and then hope 'Darren' calls and says he has a buyer for it. |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: joe
Hello Barry, they checked the counterfeit box, but look at my scans again, on the front of the toploader in large capital letters COU. |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Steve
For those not seeing the flaws in the counterfeit... |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: barrysloate
Joe- if that's a counterfeit, and I'm the first to admit that it's difficult to authenticate from a scan, it's a pretty scary one. Look at the wear on the top two corners- unlike all the fake aging done to cards, that looks like honest wear. Boy, that one could fool a lot of people. |
![]() |
|
|