![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Kevin
"Kevin- I'm sure it is possible for many altered cards to go undetected, but you make it seem like nearly every card out there is tampered with. Collectors might as well just throw in the towel. Frankly, I don't think it's true." |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: John
Kevin, |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: barrysloate
Kevin- to continue what John said I think the responsible approach is not to only post about potential card alterations and nothing else. Your last post was more balanced, and you agree that most cards out there are good, and that some aren't. Likewise, we agree it is possible to alter cards in many ways that are very difficult to detect. But no reason to scare the bejesus out of everyone with every post. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: JimCrandell
Well said Kevin--we will see who apologizes and who is ready to listen. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
Do you think the 15% figure you used is across the board. I would argue that the percentage would go up for higher graded cards than lower graded ones, as that is where more money is. We all know about the price of T206 commons, for example. A 5 might be $75 and an 8 might be $3,000......if I get that little teeny corner wear out of one corner my $75 turns into $3000.....if I have a vg card and I get the little corner wear out of a corner it becomes a vg-ex (4) and I have made $25. It seems very simple that higher end cards (especially holdered ones) would have more problems....or am I off base? Kindest regards and thanks for hanging in there with us..Hopefully we can meet someday.....leon |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: barrysloate
Jim- I agree that it is possible one or more cards in my auction have been touched up and tampered with. However, if I can't detect, and neither can the grading services, and the cards get graded anyway, what am I supposed to do? Be suspicious of every card ever consigned to me? Close down the auction because every card is a potential time bomb? At some point I have to just say here is the auction, and that's it. People are free to make their own decisions at that point. At least I go to the trouble of getting nearly every card graded. That is the best I can do. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: JimCrandell
Barry, |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: barrysloate
I appreciate what you are saying with one exception: It is likely that I have cards in my auction that have been tampered with. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: JimCrandell
Barry, |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: John
Jim, |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dave
Kevin should probably elaborate on some of the techniques card doctors use to modify and shape tobacco cards if he is as familiar with them as he says. I see no reason to continually post cryptic messages alluding to card altering. It does nothing more than inflame peoples tempers and make the poster ( in this case Kevin) look suspiciously like a crook. i perform my own conservation work on cards I own, and just about anyone can learn quite a bit by visitng a local museum. Heck you can even go to the Library of Congresses website and they cover some basic conservation techniques. Notice I use the word conservation because I don't believe it is the same as card doctoring. Those of you who don't think you can spot fakes well ought to give yourself a liitle more credit. I believe Leon stated earlier at some point that the financial investment and subsequent gain to be had by doctoring mid-grade and low grade cards is just not there, and he is right. you would have to have to mass produce doctored cards in these grades to make any money at all. My opinion is that the cards that are near mint or higher are the ones that should be suspect. I don't buy cards in those grades at all anymore. I did back in the late 80's from known and trusted collectors or dealers that were local to me. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Mike
Jim, since we haven't met, and never will, nor will you meet most of us on here, it is somewhat presumptuous of you to assume that we are incapable of identifying altered or manicured cards. I fly under the radar, always have, and always will. But do know how that makes you appear, and sound ? I own thousands of cards. Have been in the hobby for 47 years. So please don't lump us all in the same category. I am quite comfortable with my abilities. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: JimCrandell
Mike, |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: John
Jim, |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Kevin
"Do you think the 15% figure you used is across the board." |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: JimCrandell
No problem John. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: JimCrandell
Great points Kevin!! |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: John
Thanks Kevin, for your input and response. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: John
Jim, your right I have no love for this hobby, I don’t care as much as YOU do. I haven’t been collecting these cards since I was 10yrs old, I didn’t spend days dreaming on page 93 of the #3 Beckett price guide as a kid. I didn’t spend almost every waking hour pouring through antique shops and flea markets for cards as a kid. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dave
....by the way there is a difference between conservation work , and doctoring. Perhaps the only nuance being hypothetical profits that can be made from the latter. So now there is to be a book published about this subject by Kevin ? What's new here....? Nothing...guys who claim to have the knowledge and expertise Kevin does have been taking advantage of baseball card collectors since I was a kid. I didn't think it was a big deal back then when I heard people talking about the re-colored borders on some 70's Topps cards. |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: JimCrandell
Wonka, |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: T206Collector
...a T-shirt? |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Kevin
Hiding in plain sight alteration. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Chad
Just Holy Toledo. I'm staying on Mr. Wonka's good side. That is all. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: JimCrandell
T206, |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Cobby33
Too bad the current administration didn't utilize such dogged enthusiasm in finding WMD's as we are, in trying to find altered cards. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: John
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dave
Jim....please let Kevin stand behind his own statements. I don't think anyone needs you massaging his shoulders. Kevin is a big boy. Unless he signs your checks how about giving it a rest. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: T206Collector
...and I stand by my allegiance to SGC, including their guarantee. If someone ever finds one of my cards to be altered, SGC will make it right. That's the best anyone can hope for. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: John
Kevin, |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Kevin
"I do not consider this cleaning, "card doctoring" as PSA graded all of the cards I have sent them that have had this done to them." |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: JimCrandell
Thanks T206, |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dave
"that's called bleaching" |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: andy becker
kevin, |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Richard
""that's called bleaching" - only by you apparently" |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Todd Schultz
bleaching indeed |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: jay wolt
"Based only on what I've inspected, 15%-20% is about the average across the board. High end as well as low. If you are looking for posts on other subjects there are many experts here that do far better than I could ever dream of." |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: John
Kevin, |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Kevin
How then do you suggest we protect ourselves from this epidemic you speak of? |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: John
Kevin, |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: George Dreher
I agree that anything in a PRO holder is probably a piece of garbage, but CSA holders graded during the company's first couple of years have crossed over nicely for me. They have the same grading scale as ASA and the PQ grades crossover to the same number at PSA. Anything in a CSA holder from 1998 onward is questionable. |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dazed
Any chance of creating a poison pill here? Already I realise I would never consider buying a Pre-War card in NM or higher no matter what holder it's in. I find myself looking back at my old auction catalogues and seeing wavy borders and fish-hook corners on all those Mint 9 beauties. It's maddening! I have to believe that the PSA 8 Wagner has perfect vintage looking edges whether they're trimmed or not. Someone's got to say it - what if it really is possible to trim a card in such a way that it's impossible to determine when it was done? Would that really surprise any of us? Hell, we can map the human genetic code! I remember someone saying long ago, that when there is enough money in forged or altered sports memorabilia, it may attract the attention of the really master criminal. If PSA is trying to downplay this, maybe thay aren't so dumb after all. Mr. Crandell, - is crusading against this supposed to protect what you have in your collection? Fifty years from now your children may be saying "Dad sure collected a lot of plastic crap!" |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: JimCrandell
Dazed, |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: T206Collector
....even Kevin agrees that PSA "ignores the subject" while SGC "doesn't need much assistance at the moment." If you would just have all of your cards reviewed by SGC, you could ferret out many of those alterations. |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: JimCrandell
i am glad he used Baker's name. Mike is not only the best grader in the hobby but he is open and willing to learn....and Kevin has plenty to teach--may have some further observations after I speak with Dr. Kevin(as he calls himself) today. |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dave
points posted above. I think the reason we don't get any detailed information is probably #3. Why give it away for free when you can float it out there on this forum and get an idea of how much $$ can be made by writing a book about the subject. |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: JimCrandell
Dave, |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dave
As long as you know the "real inside stuff". That's all that matters Crandell. |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: JimCrandell
Just repeating what he already said buddy. |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: barrysloate
If Kevin is writing a book why would he leave out the best stuff? Isn't that the point of a research book, to be an exhaustive study on a particular topic. Why would I want to read it if I thought the most important points were intentionally omitted? |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Ernie Holmes Dies in Car Accident | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 01-19-2008 10:51 AM |
New Link for Alterations | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 10-24-2007 11:50 AM |
Josh Hancock dies in auto accident | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 04-30-2007 12:33 PM |
Your most expensive accident | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 35 | 04-11-2007 04:43 PM |
Alterations | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 01-18-2007 04:13 PM |