![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: E, Daniel
There have been a couple of good discussions recently about rarity of issue (in pure numbers of surviving cards per issue) versus condition rarity. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Mike
Since I tend to collect a certain player, I will always choose the rarest, regardless of clarity or condition. if there are only 10 left of a certain players card, I'm always of the opinion that I better grab it fast, or I may not find another for 10 years. On more common cards, say where there are 50 out there, (Which to me is not rare) I will sometimes hold off for a better looking card. But sometimes pick one up, and then look to upgrade at a later date. Rarity is very important to me. More so than condition, clarity, or the back of the card. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
I would go with rarity of a set first...then with rarity of the back....but for something like a T207 Red Cross I will go for it. I have always been a rarity collector first and a back collector second....If it's a very rare back then that's great too. Lastly I would go with rarity of condition. I do have one card that I think fits that bill. I know of no other N284's graded higher than this one.....good question Daniel. Is your self esteem any better? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jim Clarke
Here would be a tough issue to top IMO. D381's are hard to find period. Then to find them with a coupon still on them is even harder (like zeenuts). Then to throw a twist in, try finding one with the Ferguson Bakery coupon on them? My big question is should they be the same desination or have a desination like d381-2 |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: JimB
Great question. I go for aesthetics first. If I don't like the way a card looks, then the rarity does not do as much for me. |
![]() |
|
|