![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Gilbert Maines
Personally, I see beaters as falling into two (at least) catagories: |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: John S
As long as there are no major creases through the face and the name is legible a beater is fine for my collection. One of my prizes that was once buttoned and shellaced into a scrapbook: |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Tom Boblitt
as a tribute as well. Such as the backs of Buck Barker's OJ's or some of the Exhibits or Zeenuts with exhaustive statistics on them. I prefer the written 'tribute' to be on the BACK of the card though.......... |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Al C.risafulli
Pulled from a pack of 1955 Bowman I ripped open in 1991. I have taken great care to make sure the gum has remained intact for the last 15 years. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: andy becker
al, send that puppy to psa.....looks like an 8(st) to me |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Gilbert Maines
Of course, you are right Tom. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jason
curious to know what image had the misfortune to be so obscured? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Ben
In my ongoing hunt for beaters, I tend to look for cards that have been visibly well-loved by a previous owner, giving them personalities of their own. Creases and well rounded corners are virtually a must. Some sort of meaninful writing (stats, team changes, etc) are a definite plus as well. Extreme trimming is ok, as long is it was accidental and/or obviously done without the intent to deceive. Food stains, paper loss, mold, and other deformities of this sort are all badges of honor in the beater world. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Al C.risafulli
Jason, I don't remember. It's an umpire card; I keep it in a cabinet with the part of my collection that's not in "heavy rotation" that's currently blocked by boxes of other stuff. So I can't get to it. I want to say Hank Soar. Does that make sense? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Andy
I'm of the same school as Ben. I enjoy creases and paperloss, banged up corners and just ugly cards. I prefer to be able to see the image fairly well and not have too much paperloss of the front, but the back is much less important to me. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Zach Rice
My collecting beliefs are right in line with the post above me. I love lowgrade cards. I love when a card has rounded corners, maybe a few creases, etc. It shows the card was well loved, probably by some kid back when it was issued. I usually don't buy cards that have damage to the players face, though. That is the most important part of the card to me and i'd like to have that all intact. Below is one of my favorites. It smells of mold and looks to have once been chewed by a dog. I bought it from Steve Verkman at the national and couldn't have been happier with the card and the price. He has probably five more right now in his auction, all of which are in the same type of condition. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: dstudeba
I personally enjoy pertinent period writing. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: jay behrens
BcD dubbed me the King of the Krappy Kommons |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: John S
Jay, Warhop looks like a 5...maybe a 6. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Judge Dred (Fred)
I like the look that says: |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Gilbert Maines
Please be advised that at no point in time did I solicit scans of these atrocities. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Scott Gross
To answer Gil's original question: |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: jay behrens
I forgot about this attrocity in my collection |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Ben
They dont get much rougher than these bad boys. |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Zach Rice
This was left in my pant's pockets in the washer a few months back... |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: erstevens
Zach - That counts as two beaters. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: jay behrens
in your pocket? Geez, at least I keep mine in wallet. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Gilbert Maines
But you are right! The stains came out. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Judge Dred (Fred)
Does running a card through a wash cycle count as "cleaning" a card? Zach, do you plan to try to deceive one of the grading services by not disclosing this fact to them? I think you should just request the AUTH label up front rather than try to pass this "cleaned" card through the grading process. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Brett
I like beaters. They have character and they were well loved year and years ago. When i see a mint condition t206 on ebay for example, it just looks like a reprint and i don't has a desire to own it. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: quan
i dub brett the new king of the beaters...ben's been dethroned. you still have some of the coolest beaters though ben, d359/e107 plank mack etc... |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Ed McCollum
it's nice if most of the players name is on the card. Or at least on parts of the card that have been taped back together. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Brett
This might take a while, so heres a few more.... |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: t206King
DEAR GOD!!!!!! i sold you all those t206s also Brett. I only have 1 realllllly bad one now e93 griffith, still on the hunt for more!!!! |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: John Harrell
I simply want to be able to recognize the player, the card set, and any identifying characteristics, such as English only or French/English backs on the 33 WWGs. Other than that, I'd rather have a hole in my card than a hole in my binder. |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Brett
Someone should start another "Beater War" thread. |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jeff Lichtman
Jay, are you forgetting something? Or are you holding back the big gun until later? |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Joann
Yeah Jeff - I was waiting for the one of a kind die cut myself! |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: jay behrens
well, since it's been requested... |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jeff Lichtman
Ahhh..so THAT is the reason Jay was keeping his powder dry: he believes that his now world-famous card is NOT a beater. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Is this true? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 19 | 11-25-2008 09:13 PM |
trading beater m116 's for beater cubs m116's | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 12-16-2007 10:03 AM |
Anyone know if this is true? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 02-08-2006 11:28 AM |
This Is So True | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 03-08-2004 11:11 AM |
This is True! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 05-24-2003 11:35 AM |