![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: ErikV
In reading the CNN story Neal posted, a portion of the the article stated: |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: peter ullman
less than 1.2 million. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: barrysloate
My guess is 2 million. I think buyers are willing to put blinders on and believe in the PSA grade. Their wish to own it will trump the facts. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Hal Lewis
It all depends on whether the folks with past knowledge come forward and show their evidence of the card having been trimmed. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Brett
The PSA 8 Wagner is trimmed !! |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Bruce Babcock
I would say more than it sold for last time. $1.5 to 2 million would not surprise me. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: barrysloate
I think it's REA's Baltimore News Ruth. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: JimB
The Nagy Wagner GAI 3.5 (currently SGC 40) sold for over $450k. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Peter Spaeth
I wish that people who don't have evidence, or aren't willing to provide it, would not assert as a FACT that the card is trimmed. If you would like to make out a case based on publicly available scans of the card, and offer an opinion as to why from the scan you see evidence of trimming, that would be appropriate in my view. If you have other compelling evidence, that would also be appropriate in my view. But to just say it's trimmed, or to say I know it's trimmed but without providing your support, is not fair to the current owner. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: barrysloate
Bruce- I misunderstood your question. I thought you meant the highest price outside any T206 Wagner. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Joe Tocco
I heard the story about the current owner turning down $2 million a couple of years ago. I believe it. With the vintage card market gains over the last 6 years, and the increasing notoriety of this particular card over that same time, my best guess would be $2.5-3 million. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: TONY Galovich
About 2 weeks after the current owner purchased This card, a cash offer was tendered from a japanese consortium in the $2 million area....the current owner turned the offer down...... |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
Who on this board has definitively said they know the Wagner PSA8 to be trimmed? |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Bruce Babcock
Actually, Barry, you got the question right, in spite of the way I worded it. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Rick
It is the card... |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Rich Mueller
From SportsCollectorsDaily.com... |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Multi t206 Wagner owner question... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 09-15-2008 01:43 PM |
D322 Wagner PSA 3 - Valuation question? | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 15 | 04-18-2008 09:34 PM |
T-206 Wagner PSA Question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 21 | 12-24-2007 09:28 AM |
FS: T206 Heine Wagner ("the other T206 Wagner") PSA 4 - $79 | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 12-19-2007 08:46 PM |
December auctions - T206 Honus Wagner cards PSA 4 and PSA 1 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 11-17-2004 05:49 PM |