![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jim Clarke
Got in a group of OJ's today from an auction house. Advertised as poor-fair condition. It looks like some of them have been trimmed. When I call the company they said that is why they are in that grade. I thought they were in that grade because of having creases in them and scap book paper on the back. Should they have mentional that they have been altered or trimmed or by stating the grade no mention was neccessary? JC |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
T206 poor-fair condition Bill Hart SLer FOR SALE $35 | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 3 | 09-06-2007 08:08 PM |
WANTED: T205 Cobb in poor-fair condition | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 2 | 06-02-2007 10:28 PM |
Wanted: E95 Poor/Fair | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 4 | 03-22-2007 05:45 AM |
Wanted: T3 and T209-1 (poor-fair) | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 01-06-2007 07:57 AM |
Broadleaf 460 Good,Fair or Poor? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 03-17-2003 07:13 AM |