![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: barrysloate
On a recent thread we discussed the harsh way the grading services treat a little back damage on blank backed cards, and how it was time for them to reconsider the process. Here's an new idea I want to suggest: Suppose you submitted two Old Judges in identical condition, and each was worthy of a VG-EX 4 holder. However, one had a pristine rich photo, as perfect as they come, and the other had a light, blurry and unattractive one. I say the strong photo should be rewarded and bumped up one grade to an EX 5, and the blurry one penalized a grade and given a VG 3. In the real marketplace, the clearer one will sell for nearly twice the other, so why not reflect that distinction in the grade? I think it's time for photo quality to be given strong consideration when assigning a grade. What do others think? |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Any idea what this is? | Archive | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 4 | 01-21-2009 05:52 AM |
Any idea what this is? | Archive | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 7 | 08-20-2008 06:10 PM |
Any Idea What Happened to.............. | Archive | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 1 | 10-16-2007 11:42 AM |
Any idea on how to | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 03-06-2004 05:52 AM |
Cool idea....but | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 01-21-2003 12:55 PM |