![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Brian McQueen
Was curious what the experienced collectors of this set thought of the difficulty of acquiring some of the individual cards in this set or, in other words, which players are tougher to find than others? Are there any cards in this set that have the reputation as being thoroughly troublesome such as the e102 Miller fielding or the e90-3 Hahn? Or is the player difficulty more evenly spread throughout the set similar to the e90-2s? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Bruce Babcock
I found no E103 any tougher than any other. All of them are tough, period. I put together the set between 1997 & 1999 and paid less than $100 each for most of the cards, and only Cobb & Wagner were more than $500. Times have changed. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Richard Masson
Stll looking for Frank Chance |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: BcD
1) The Doyle cards are harder to find in the E-102 set then the Miller fielding~ especially the throwing pose. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: barrysloate
I think we both wouldn't mind having that one back. Who knew? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: BcD
.....maybe? :0 |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
P2 Difficulty Question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 06-20-2007 03:29 PM |
e92 wagner difficulty | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 06-20-2007 06:32 AM |
wtb: e103 Wagner, e103 Cobb, e103 Mathewson | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 2 | 03-23-2007 07:33 AM |
I have far greater difficulty locating specific commons | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 08-24-2005 06:02 AM |
mathewson,young,johnson portrait difficulty | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 07-10-2005 09:42 AM |