![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: ockday
If M116's were released in 24 series of 12 cards each, why is a set considered complete at 287 cards (not including variations)rather than 288 ? Sorry if this is a dumb question but I can't seem to figure it out. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Anson
I don't believe there's a cataloged #61 or #280 in the set yet. I could be wrong. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Bob
Ahhh. Tim and I are working on that and other musteries of the set for an article for Old Cardboard. Lyman has shown an incredible amount of patience as sometimes life gets in the way of our love |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: ockday
Thanks guys! |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Bob
Alan- Tim pointed out to me that an awful lot of the past documentation regarding which cards are from which series and has been used and copied and sworn to over the years is flat out wrong. Hopefully we can shed light on this and try to correct some glaring discrepancies. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: scott
i have one of the sporting life ads which list ALL series by player and there are indeed 288 diff players with no double prints that i could see. i imagine there is a numbering problem in the SCD book. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Tim Newcomb
Yes, as Scott says, there are 24 complete series of 12 cards each, which means the catalog in question is numbered wrong somewhere. Then there are the variations, which means that a master set would be AT LEAST 326, but really more-- |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: ockday
Not only does the SCD book list the set as 287 cards but so do both the PSA ans SGC set registrys. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Tim Newcomb
That's weird about the SCD catalog saying 287-- they must have just missed one, and never corrected it. The set registries probably just went from their mistake. I'll let someone else figure out who's missing from the lists. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: scott brockelman
i spent about 15 minutes looking over the numbering and players but could not find the omissin or error? |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Tim Newcomb
That's right! Bob and I are planning to invent several "new" variations, team shifts, and alternate poses, in order to fox those smug people (like yourself) who think they have complete sets |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Ted Zanidakis
Tim |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Harry Wallace (HW)
Ted, |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Tim Newcomb
Hi Ted, |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: tbob
Tim- Does that include the blue background Joe Jackson we discovered last month? Oops, cat out of the bag |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Joe_G.
TTT |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: tbob
White and Grey backgrounds, you eagle eye you |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
M116 Sporting Life graded | Archive | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 0 | 06-17-2008 10:10 AM |
M116 Sporting Life For Sale | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 8 | 01-19-2008 10:57 AM |
For Trade: Various M116 Sporting Life | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 1 | 08-03-2007 02:43 PM |
m116 sale sporting life | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 3 | 04-09-2007 05:24 PM |
Has anyone ever soaked an M116 Sporting Life? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 04-02-2006 09:44 PM |