![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: joe maples
Hello there, I had some cards graded by SGC this week, 3 cards were not graded. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: BlackSoxFan
Too small to holder means just that ... they don't have a holder that will fit those cards...i'm not sure why they would accept them in the first place if they didn't have a holder for them.... |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: warshawlaw
I had a card rejected for this and asked for an explanation. Their response was that the graders felt that not enough of the card was there to merit grading but that the card was not trimmed in the sense of being deceptively shaved down. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Bottom of the Ninth
I beleive Too Small To Holder means the card itself was undersized and they will not place it in a holder due to the perception of it having been trimmed. Normally you see Miscut it relates to factory cut cards. Maybe the W514 was cut poorly. A call to them will answer these questions. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: joe maples
If it is trimmed, why not say trimmed? I had another card in the group that came back as trimmed. And I'm pretty sure they grade the strip cards, I checked on their site, but will check again. I think I will call them on this, I did get charged for the cards not graded. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: joe maples
Here are the cards. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
Although I respectfully disagree with SGC not grading these particular cards I see their point. If the "cut" was more outside the "lines" then I think they would have graded them. I think they should grade them as "handcut" and give them a grade....but that probably opens a can of worms ...... |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: BlackSoxFan
leon - ..if they cut outside the lines on one card, wouldn't it mean that the card next to it would be cut inside the lines? Kind of eliminates a lot of them from being gradeable.... grading strip cards in slabs is sooo wierd. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
I have some strips like these (don't know if identical set) at home and think there might be a little space between the cards. I will check later...unless someone knows off hand. I sort of think all strip cards should be graded as "handcut" and AUT.....period......but then there is that proverbial can of worms.....new cut vs. old cut....though it wouldn't really matter if they were new or old cuts in my grading scenario... |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Greg Ecklund
I had an e90-1 Clarke that SGC wouldn't holder because of the same "too small to holder" explanation - it was fairly far from the minimum size restrictions for an e90-1 but I didn't think it was trimmed and apparently SGC didn't either. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: joe maples
Well, here is the email answer from SGC, sounds a little vague don't you think? Sounds like writer is guessing too. Also here is the Campau they did not grade as Too small to holder. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Joe G.
I also submitted a Campau and had it rejected for the same reason. Otherwise a nice card. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: t206 cards - SGC graded | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 01-17-2009 08:45 AM |
T205 SGC graded cards for trade. | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 12-04-2008 10:12 PM |
SGC Graded M116 Cards Wanted | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 1 | 03-09-2006 03:37 PM |
sizes of sgc and beckett graded cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 12-28-2005 09:43 PM |
SGC Graded E96 Cards SOLD | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 1 | 07-27-2005 04:19 PM |