![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Mike
Hi everyone, I have some nice PSA graded vintage cards I want to post scans like Hal has done on his awesome web site. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Hal Lewis
I just lay the slab down on the scanner and it comes out fine. I've never had your problem. Weird. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: DJ
This is a problem I still struggle with, getting the most out of my scanner and graded cards. I have a Canon but I can't get picture perfect scans either and must tweak my Photo Workshop program to sharpen the image and it still isn't crystal, but passable. If you do a search on the VBC Forum site, this topic has been discussed at length and should further help you. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: ockday
I had the same problem with my Canon scanner and could never solve it. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: T206Collector
Not that I'm a huge Canon proponent or anything, but I thought it only fair to mention that I have a very inexpensive Canon scanner (like $50) and it works beautifully for graded card scans. No adjustment necessary. Just use the "magazine" setting in my software and scan away! |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Andy Cook
My old Lexmark scanner always made graded cards blurry. I recently bought an HP Scanner 3970 for $40 on Ebay and it does great images. Here's an example. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Julie Vognar
(my last two scanners). |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: adamb
The ultra thin scanners (such as the one I believe you have) do not have the depth of scan as the thicker scanners. I posted a message with a link a while back on this topic that describes the differences. I had a Canon LIDE that I ended up giving away and replacing with a less expensive Canon that does not use LED optics. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: pete
i cant even figure out how to "post" a scan of a damn card!...i'd be happy with blurry right now. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Mike
First off, the scan of the Goslin is gorgeous. I am going to get that very scanner --- my scans don't come out even close! And yes, I think the Canon LiDE is just so thin that it's very virtue of compactness kills it here. Thanks so much for your help and happy collecting! I am bummed out by all my bids getting crushed on Mastro, so I am taking a little hobby break myself. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Josh K.
I use an epson and it works beautifully. some examples. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Mike
Josh, could you let me know the make of your Epson? Thanks! |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Josh K.
Mike, |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: vetekbob
here is the exact model brand new on ebay and less than 100 including fedex shipping. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1933 Goudey #92 Lou Gehrig PSA 4 *Scan* | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 03-20-2008 10:52 PM |
Peaches Graham E90-1 PSA 2 scan added | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 2 | 04-02-2007 05:59 PM |
Does anybody have a scan of these cards? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 02-02-2007 07:08 PM |
Bad scan, good scan | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 08-22-2005 09:04 PM |
--Elliot: Scott is looking for a scan of a (my) T206 Plank--did AN YONE save the scan? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 03-28-2003 08:56 AM |