![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: pete
If I have a SGC 96/9 of a major star, can I expect to get "closer" to the SMR price of a PSA 9 or a PSA 8 when I go to sell ??? Not taken into the demand of certain players or cards. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: warshawlaw
the premise of the question is flawed Check to see if PSA has even graded a "9" of the card; odds are it hasn't, but that's never stopped it from fluffing up a price on one |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Lee Behrens
If I bought high end cards I personally would pay more for a SGC 96 over a PSA 9 because they don't give out that grade as readily as PSA. I know I would not have to pay as much because they don't have as many collectors of high end SGC cards as those people that pay assstronomical prices for there card registry. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: JimB
When you go to sell, generally a PSA 9 would go for more, unless the card was extremely rare and people just want the card no matter what. I have not done the scientific survey but based on casual observation, PSA graded cards demand more in the marketplace. I personally don't care and I think there are sometimes good deals on SGC and GAI graded cards. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
WTT T205 Cobb PSA 4 for T206 Cy Young Port. PSA/SGC 4-5 | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 08-03-2008 11:08 PM |
WTT for aT206 Magie SGC 10 or PSA 1 or PSA A | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 07-21-2008 08:24 PM |
W600 Krueger SGC 50 Pitt., Curtis Ireland Holke SGC 60, Willards Hornsby PSA 2mk for sale | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 01-27-2008 03:01 PM |
PSA 1 p-f vs. SGC 10 and SGC 20 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 06-08-2006 10:07 AM |
SGC v. PSA | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 11-19-2003 05:57 PM |